Global headline inflation is projected to rise notably to 4.7% in 2026

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has said that global economic activity has proven resilient once again.

The technology upturn, buffers, and adaptations have helped mitigate the damage from geopolitics-driven disruptions, the fund said.

It stated that global growth is projected to slow to 3.1 percent in 2026 and rebound to 3.4 percent in 2027. Global headline inflation is projected to rise notably to 4.7 percent in 2026 before easing to 4.1 percent in 2027. Energy-importing economies outside the technology value chain face the most difficult outlook. 

But the margins of adjustment that helped resilience are not limitless, and risks are skewed to the downside.

The IMF said this in its October 2026 World Economic Outlook report.

The Fund said further escalation in conflicts, a reassessment of expectations surrounding artificial intelligence (AI), renewed trade tensions, and fiscal vulnerabilities could weaken growth. On the upside, stronger momentum in AI investment and productivity gains from AI or a sustained easing of geopolitical and trade tensions could strengthen growth. 

The technology cycle has provided a demand impulse, driven by strong investment in artificial intelligence (AI). The interaction of these forces—geopolitics and technology—has produced a split global economy: Favorable terms of trade or technology-related exports and investment give some countries a cushion, whereas others face higher import bills and weaker demand. Use of buffers and adaptability have helped economies weather the negative shocks so far.

Flexible supply responses, rerouting of shipments, inventory drawdowns, fiscal support measures, and lower energy intensity than in previous decades have helped contain the hit to activity from the war.

Private firms have continued to adjust to repeated shocks, including geopolitical risk and shifts in trade policy, while financial markets have maintained a broadly benign view of the challenges, also buoyed by exuberance in the technology segment.

Yet these margins of adjustment are not unlimited. Inventories have been drawn down, commodity markets remain vulnerable, fragmentation could become a greater drag on efficiency, prolonged uncertainty could eventually weigh more heavily on confidence, constraints on energy could impair the AI-led impetus, and financing conditions could change abruptly for any number of reasons, including fiscal sustainability concerns.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has said that global growth is projected at 3.1 percent in 2026 and 3.4 percent in 2027, unchanged for 2026 and revised moderately upward for 2027, relative to the projections in the April 2026 World Economic Outlook (WEO).

Global headline inflation is projected to increase to 4.7 percent in 2026 before easing to 4.1 percent in 2027, marking a cumulative upward revision of 0.7 percentage point with the temporary increase driven mainly by energy and food prices.

The stable global aggregate masks a reallocation of growth across economies. Countries with limited direct exposure to the war shock and strong participation in the technology upturn are seeing activity hold up or strengthen.

Energy exporters outside the immediate conflict zone benefit from favorable terms of trade. Conversely, energy-importing economies with little connection to the technology value chain face the most difficult configuration: higher import costs and exchange rate pressures, weaker real incomes, more constrained fiscal space, and fewer offsetting demand impulses.

Many low-income and vulnerable countries belong to this latter group, increasing the risk that recent shocks will widen income gaps across and within countries.

World trade volume growth is projected to slow in 2026 and stabilize in 2027, reflecting the drag from tariffs, adjustment in production chains, and continued strength in technology-related trade. Global imbalances are expected to decline only modestly over the medium term, as large fiscal deficits, limited domestic rebalancing, technology-driven capital flows, and differing demand compositions across major economies under current policies continue to sustain external gaps.

The medium-term growth outlook remains lackluster by historical standards and uneven across countries, in part reflecting varying degrees of AI preparedness and robustness of the energy mix. Risks are skewed to the downside. A prolonged stalemate or further escalation in the Middle East could keep energy and food prices elevated and volatile, revive inflationary pressures, worsen fiscal and external balances, and weigh on growth.

Further disruptions to energy infrastructure, cyberattacks, or extreme weather events could amplify these effects. As the Commodity Special Feature shows, price increases driven by physical supply disruptions have larger and more persistent macroeconomic effects than those driven by geopolitical risks.

A reassessment of AI-related profitability and productivity prospects could sharply reduce investment, trigger equity market corrections, and tighten financial conditions, with spillovers to economies integrated into technology supply chains and stakes in technology stocks.