Meet your dinner! Woke scientists say giving pigs and chickens names could put children off eating meat

Forget chicken nuggets – the next time your child asks what's for dinner, you should tell them they're eating Chico.

That's according to scientists from SWPS University in Poland , who say giving chickens names and a backstory could put children off eating poultry.

The team discovered that naming an animal and describing its favourite habits is enough to make preschoolers choose meat less often.

And it could mean that telling your child about Peppa the pig, Clara the cow, Tim the turkey and Larry the lamb could leave them thinking twice about what's on their plate.

'A key finding of the experiment concerns the role of an animal's uniqueness,' author Aleksandra Rabinovitch said.

'Presenting a chicken as an individual with its own name and truly distinctive traits was more effective at discouraging the choice of poultry meat than presenting a chicken that had a name but was otherwise similar to other chickens.

'This implies that giving an animal a name helps a child view it as a being worthy of protection, provided that the name serves to distinguish the animal as unique.

'This sense of uniqueness encourages children to extend their concern to other, anonymous members of the same species.'

For their study, the researchers carried out two experiments involving preschool children aged five and six.

The youngsters were shown a chicken and, in some cases, told its name along with details about its favourite foods and daily habits.

'This is Lelek, the only chicken of his kind in the world,' the children were told. 

'Lelek lives in the chicken coop with other hens.

'Lelek's favourite food is grains; whenever he smells them, he cheerfully clucks ko, ko, ko. Lelek enjoys running around the yard with the other chicks, basking in the sun, and pecking at the grass.'

The children were then asked questions about the animal and invited to make their own toy sandwiches using ingredients including chicken and pork cold cuts, slices of cheese and tomato.

Analysis showed that personalising a chicken reduced children's willingness to eat poultry, with youngsters choosing fewer chicken slices and expressing greater reluctance to eat the bird after learning about its name, habits and favourite foods.

A second experiment involved introducing the children to either a unique chicken called Chico, a chicken described as one of many similar birds, or chickens in general.

Analysis revealed the children who learned about a named, distinctive chicken were less likely to choose poultry.

However, concern for one animal did not translate into a blanket rejection of meat.

Children who bonded with a chicken were less likely to choose poultry, but were no less willing to eat pork.

The effect was also largely limited to youngsters who were not already enthusiastic meat–eaters.

The researchers found that children who strongly enjoyed eating meat remained unmoved by stories about named farm animals.

'Overall, the findings suggest that although animal identifiability can reduce children's intentions to consume meat, its impact is moderated by pre–existing food preferences,' the team wrote in the journal Appetite.

The researchers said their findings could even help turn youngsters into vegetarians, as it encourages them to turn to plant–based foods instead.

And in the long run this could be better for their health and the planet, they argued.