The Supreme Court registry has flagged 14 defects in the INDIA bloc's petition filed against the Election Commission of India, delaying its listing. The identified flaws include missing vakalatnamas or signed lawyer authorisations for 9 out of 11 petitioners, including Akhilesh Yadav, Tejashwi Yadav, and Sanjay Raut. The registry also pointed out an illegible identity copy of Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, an incomplete court fee short by 220 rupees, and missing supporting records. Furthermore, the registry questioned why individual election commissioners were named alongside the Election Commission as an institution. The top court has asked for digital copies of the June 24 Election Commission decision and records concerning claimed voter deletions on a pen drive. The legal team representing the opposition alliance must rectify all flagged procedural defects before the petition can be formally cleared and scheduled for a hearing before the judges.
Read More
LATEST VIDEOS
Vijay Deverakonda, Rashmika Mandanna Meet CM Vijay Ahead Of Rana Bali Release
Actors Vijay Deverakonda and Rashmika Mandanna met Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Vijay in Chennai ahead of the theatrical release of their upcoming movie, Rana Bali. Reflecting on the meeting, Deverakonda praised Chief Minister Vijay for offering a warm reception despite having a long day, adding that the leader shared personal insights into life, work, and the world. Scheduled for a worldwide theatrical release on October 16, Rana Bali is set against the backdrop of the Madras famine. The period film marks another significant cinematic collaboration between Deverakonda and Mandanna following their marriage in February 2026.
Karnataka High Court Quashes SC/ST Quota Hike; Siddaramaiah Targets BJP
A political flashpoint has emerged following the Karnataka High Court's decision to strike down the enhanced reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The quashed legislation had increased Scheduled Caste reservation from 15% to 17% and Scheduled Tribe reservation from 3% to 7%, breaching the 50% ceiling. Congress leader Siddaramaiah stated that the verdict is a serious setback to historically marginalised communities and questioned the previous Bharatiya Janata Party administration for announcing the quota expansion ahead of the 2023 assembly elections without ensuring its constitutional sustainability. He highlighted recommendations from the Justice Nagamohan Das Committee regarding census data. The development triggers fresh debate over who bears responsibility as students and job aspirants face the fallout.
Tamil Nadu CM Vijay To Meet AP Counterpart Naidu Today; Krishna Water Sharing High On Agenda
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay is scheduled to meet Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N. Chandrababu Naidu today in Vijayawada. Marking their first official bilateral meeting, talks at Naidu's residence will primarily focus on interstate river water management and sharing disputes involving the Krishna-Godavari river system. Chief Minister Vijay is slated to land in Vijayawada at 3:30 p.m., followed by bilateral talks with Naidu at 4:15 p.m. Later in the evening, Vijay is scheduled to offer prayers at the Kanaka Durga Temple and visit the National Saras Exhibition during the ongoing Vijayawada Utsav 2.0 celebrations before departing for Chennai around 8:30 p.m.
Karnataka High Court Quashes SC-ST Quota Hike Passed by Bommai Regime
The Karnataka High Court struck down provisions of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Reservation Act 2022 that increased quotas for Scheduled Castes from 15 percent to 17 percent and Scheduled Tribes from 3 percent to 7 percent. A division bench comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice KS Hemalekha ruled that Section 3 of the Act was unconstitutional as the enhancement breached the 50 percent aggregate reservation ceiling. The legislation, enacted under the previous Basavaraj Bommai-led BJP government, raised total reservations to 56 percent and was challenged by social activist Mahendra from Raichur citing Supreme Court precedent.

