The Briefing:
- Nine major banks are named in the OCC's October 14 report: JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citibank, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bank, Capital One, PNC, TD Bank, and BMO Bank.
- The agency reviewed 100,000 complaints and hundreds of bank decisions spanning 2020 through September 2025.
- Targeted sectors included oil and gas, firearms, cryptocurrency, and political action committees from across the partisan spectrum.
- The OCC is still working through thousands of additional complaints and has placed banks on notice that referrals to the attorney general are a possibility.
The OCC's Verdict: A Government Charter Deployed as an Ideological Filter
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency released its findings on October 14 — the product of a supervisory review ordered by President Trump's August 2025 executive order titled "Guaranteeing Fair Banking for All Americans." The conclusion was unambiguous: every one of the nine largest national banks the OCC supervises had policies in place that functioned as ideological screens for customers seeking access to financial services.
Comptroller Jonathan V. Gould delivered a pointed verdict. "Today's report provides irrefutable evidence that the nation's largest banks have denied, debanked and discriminated against customers and lawful businesses," he said in a statement Wednesday. He added that fair access to financial services "is not a mantra — it is a mandate" and made clear the OCC intends to hold institutions accountable, including through potential referrals to the attorney general.
The review also identified a specific aggravating pattern: some banks triggered heightened scrutiny of customers not on financial grounds, but based on negative media coverage — effectively turning press attention into a disqualifying factor for anyone seeking a bank account.
Who Got Cut Off: From MAGA Merchants to Firearms Dealers
The report documented a broad sweep of industries that encountered escalated scrutiny or outright service denials at one or more of the nine banks. Companies operating in oil and gas, coal, firearms, tobacco, payday lending, adult entertainment, cryptocurrency, private prisons, and political action committees all appeared on internal restricted-service lists — a pattern the OCC found reflected in the banks' own written policies and annual ESG reports.
One documented example involves WePay, a payment processor acquired by JPMorgan Chase in 2017, which terminated accounts belonging to merchants selling MAGA- and Trump-branded merchandise. JPMorgan said the conduct "did not meet our expectations" and acknowledged the problem was identified, corrected, and that WePay "no longer operates."
The findings carry a bipartisan dimension that complicates the dominant political narrative. The OCC confirmed that Democratic-leaning organizations were also among those denied services — including a group that advocates for abortion rights and a public education organization whose political arm had endorsed Democratic candidates — meaning politically motivated debanking did not flow in only one direction.
Banks Deflect as Their Trade Group Steps Forward
Most of the named institutions chose not to respond individually. Citibank and Wells Fargo both declined to comment, pointing reporters instead to the Bank Policy Institute, the sector's primary lobbying organization.
"The banking industry supports fair access to banking services and has been working to ensure that government regulations and policies enable banks to serve law-abiding customers," the group said in a statement. The Bank Policy Institute also backed the administration's push to eliminate "reputational risk" as an examination metric, a standard banks argued had effectively pressured them into avoiding politically sensitive industries.
JPMorgan took a more direct approach, asserting that its policies explicitly prohibit discrimination on political or religious grounds while acknowledging the WePay episode as a corrected failure.
A DOJ Probe Runs Parallel — and Carries Real Teeth
The OCC's accountability framework is not the only pressure facing the banks. A separate and potentially more consequential investigation is underway at the Justice Department. D.C. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro opened a probe in June 2026 focused on whether major banks violated the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 — a statute traditionally used in bank fraud prosecutions — by closing accounts linked to conservatives, including defendants from the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot.
The subpoenas issued by Pirro's office demand full account-closure lists along with written explanations for each termination. Pirro launched the inquiry on her own initiative, independent of any OCC referral — but according to people familiar with the matter, the two offices have since begun working together on the expanding investigation.
Dueling Lawsuits and a $5 Billion Claim Against JPMorgan
The civil litigation front has been just as active. In March 2025, the Trump Organization and Eric Trump sued Capital One, accusing the bank of closing more than 300 accounts connected to Trump-associated businesses for political reasons. Capital One has said in court filings that the closures followed a months-long review by its anti-money-laundering team, not any political calculation. Then in January 2026, President Trump personally sued JPMorgan Chase and CEO Jamie Dimon, seeking at least $5 billion in damages for the bank's closure of accounts tied to his businesses following January 6. JPMorgan has called the suit meritless.
What Comes Next: No Penalties Yet, but the Pressure Is Building
Bank regulators this year eliminated "reputational risk" as an examination category — removing a mechanism critics said had quietly pushed institutions to distance themselves from lawful but politically contentious clients. The final OCC report also provides official documentary weight to the cryptocurrency sector's longstanding argument that banks used ESG and compliance rationales to systematically exclude digital asset companies from the banking system.
The October 14 report did not announce fines or formal enforcement actions against any of the named banks. Not everyone views that outcome as sufficient. Cato Institute policy analyst Nicholas Anthony said the OCC's findings "failed to mention some of the most well-known causes of debanking," suggesting the full scope of the practice remains unaddressed even in the agency's final report.
With thousands of complaints still under active review, referrals to federal prosecutors now explicitly on the table, and a criminal probe already drawing on bank subpoenas, the debanking reckoning has moved well past the stage of regulatory observation — into territory where the financial consequences for Wall Street could become far more concrete.
© {{Year}} Latin Times. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.