Dhruv Bhutani has covered the Android ecosystem since 2010, with a focus on smartphones, connected devices, and home networking. His reporting is informed by hands-on experience reviewing hundreds of smartphones and testing a wide range of smart home and audio products over more than a decade. He has attended Mobile World Congress eight times since 2011 and IFA Berlin five times, alongside regular coverage of launch events and industry briefings from companies including Google, Xiaomi, Oppo, and Qualcomm. This on-ground access and long-term exposure to product cycles inform how he evaluates hardware, software direction, and ecosystem shifts.
First-Hand Experience
Reviewed and tested hundreds of smartphones since 2009
Tested smart home, audio, and connected devices across multiple categories
Attended Mobile World Congress (8 times, first in 2011)
Attended IFA Berlin (5 times)
Covered industry events including Qualcomm Summit and launch events from Google, Xiaomi, Oppo, and Vivo
Career History
CNET — Freelance Editor
May 2024 – Present
Android Police — Freelance Editor
July 2023 – Present
Android Authority — Contributor
November 2022 – Present
Android Authority — Editor
January 2019 – October 2022
FoneArena — Editor
February 2010 – January 2018
PhoneReport.info — International Correspondent
February 2010 – May 2011
Nokia Mobile Talk — Writer
June 2009 – October 2009
I stream music all day long. As a compulsive music listener, I usually have fresh tracks, old playlists, and new albums running in the background while I work, cook, write, or hit the gym.
For years, Spotify's default quality has been perfectly serviceable. I knew I wasn't getting the best sound, but I didn't think I was missing anything.
So when I learned about Spotify's HiFi Lossless feature, I was curious what the big deal was.
I expected minor bass extension and maybe less harsh treble. Instead, I kept it enabled because it fixes small but real frustrations in the listening experience that I didn't know I had.
What's the big deal?
The trade-off between file size and audio quality is real
The problem is simple. Compressed audio makes trade-offs to meet size constraints. It reduces file sizes so that music streams smoothly, but that process removes detail from the original recording.
I never noticed it because audio compression is pretty good today. But after I switched to lossless streaming and listened through my high-end headphones and speakers, I heard details that had been dulled down.
And no, it's not placebo. The difference is very noticeable with premium headphones.
Being able to hear details I didn't know existed is what changed how I listen to music.
What Spotify HiFi actually changes in your listening experience
A noticeable difference in vocals and instrument separation
Spotify's HiFi mode streams music in a lossless format, delivering the full mastered recording without trimming data to save bandwidth. In practical terms, this means CD-quality audio instead of compressed streams.
In the streaming era, we stepped back from high-quality music to manage bandwidth and data caps better. But as technology has caught up, that's no longer a real limitation.
If all that sounds technical, the effect is straightforward. There's more texture, more separation, and a bit more headroom between elements in the same song.
One of the first places I noticed it was in the vocals. On compressed streams, some voices feel slightly flattened, especially when layered with effects and heavy instrumentation.
With lossless enabled, vocals sit more clearly in the mix. That's where you notice the biggest difference. On compressed streams, vocals often get lost and sound more suppressed.
Now, I can hear layers like the artist breathing between phrases, or a slight rasp or warble in the delivery. These details were always there, but compression often dampens them. Uncompressed audio makes them sound more present.
Instruments benefit too. The acoustic guitar has more body and resonance. Cymbals sound full, and piano notes carry more weight and a more organic feeling.
In complex tracks, like acoustic music, the music feels less crowded. Instead of every audio track fighting for breathing room within the same compressed dynamic range, there's more breathing room, so to speak.
The difference isn't night and day, and it matters most when I'm paying attention and doing so-called critical listening.
If I am wearing wired headphones connected to my laptop or an external DAC, or through my high-end speakers with my Wiim Ultra streamer and Spotify Connect, the differences are audible.
When I switch to Bluetooth earbuds, I can't really tell much of a difference. Bluetooth compresses the signal enough that the gains are inaudible.
What's ironic is that after years of listening to compressed streams, my ears adjusted quickly.
After just a few days of listening exclusively to lossless streams, I can immediately make out the difference when I go back to standard streaming.
It's not as if the music is unlistenable, but I can feel the difference in quality.
Lossless streaming makes you more intentional about how you listen
Match your audio quality to the gear you use
Having access to lossless streaming has also changed my listening habits. More importantly, it means being a bit more selective about how you curate your experience.
For example, when I commute, I often connect my phone to the car with a wired connection instead of Bluetooth. My car's audio system is good enough to make the difference apparent.
However, when I'm at the gym, I'll switch to regular quality. The benefit isn't worth it when I'm sweating on the treadmill or at the weight rack with Bluetooth fitness earbuds.
Elsewhere, in my study and living room, I use bookshelf speakers paired with high-end audio streamers.
Spotify Lossless has elevated my music experience, and I seek out albums mastered well enough to do them justice.
It's turned music from an important but mostly passive hobby into an active experience I curate.
It's about removing friction between you and the music
Spotify's lossless mode won't immediately make you an audiophile or audio snob. I'm not one either. Compressed audio has its uses.
But when I'm sitting at my desk or in my lounge chair listening to music over high-quality speakers, I want the best possible experience.
If I have the option to get an uncompressed stream that delivers the best possible audio to my speakers, why wouldn't I? It removes a layer of compression between me and the music, and I'm all for it.
