An Indian YouTuber’s no-money travel adventure hits a wall in Udon Thani. Banshi is told to leave a temple, refuses a ฿400 hotel and heads for a petrol station. His video triggers fierce online criticism, while viewers praise Thai police for helping.
An Indian YouTuber travelling across Thailand without money has sparked fury after police expelled him from a Buddhist temple in Udon Thani. Banshi, who has 17,300 subscribers, refused a ฿400 hotel room offered by officers and headed to a petrol station to sleep. He then posted a video describing the encounter as his first bad experience at a Thai temple. However, Thai and Indian viewers hit back, questioning his reliance on strangers for food and shelter. The controversy has exposed a growing Indian YouTube travel genre, with some creators attracting millions of followers. Meanwhile, Banshi’s immigration status remains unknown, although police have announced no charges against the intrepid traveller.
An Indian YouTuber travelling across Thailand without money has sparked fury after police ordered him out of a Buddhist temple in Udon Thani.
The traveller, known as Banshi, wanted free overnight accommodation but refused a nearby hotel costing just ฿400.
Instead, he headed to a petrol station to sleep. He then posted a video describing the encounter as his first bad experience at a Thai temple. However, the footage triggered criticism from Thai and Indian viewers, who questioned his demands and travelling methods.
The controversy has also exposed a growing Indian YouTube genre built around hitchhiking, free accommodation and strangers’ generosity.
Indian YouTuber seeking free temple shelter in Udon Thani is told to leave as police offer a hotel
The incident came to public attention on Sunday, October 11, following reports by Thai news outlets Khaosod and Naewna. The Indian traveller operates the YouTube channel Anything Banshi, which has approximately 17,300 subscribers and 458 videos.
He documents journeys without hotels or conventional transport, relying on strangers for food, shelter and assistance. However, his approach encountered resistance when he attempted to spend the night at a Buddhist temple in Udon Thani.
Police attended the temple after concerns arose about his presence. Temple committee members also joined the discussions. Officers explained that outsiders could not use the temple grounds for overnight accommodation.
They subsequently instructed Banshi to collect his belongings and leave. However, police did not arrest him or announce criminal charges. Instead, they attempted to arrange alternative accommodation for the Indian visitor.
During the encounter, Banshi admitted he was touring Thailand without money. He explained that strangers provided food, assistance and places to sleep. According to the video, police and temple representatives expressed concern about his personal safety. They suggested a nearby budget hotel offering rooms for approximately ฿400 per night. Furthermore, officers offered to help him reach the accommodation.
Banshi refuses a ฿400 hotel room, moves to a petrol station and posts his encounter with Thai police
Banshi refused the proposal. He insisted on maintaining his extremely low-cost approach to travelling. Consequently, he gathered his belongings and left the temple.
Rather than accept the hotel room, he moved to a petrol station, intending to sleep there overnight. Police also advised him about personal safety and continuing his journey through Thailand.
There is no indication that officers used force or threatened the traveller. Instead, the available accounts describe police explaining the temple’s position and offering practical assistance. The temple’s name has not been established in published reports.
Likewise, the identities of the officers involved remain unknown. The precise date of the encounter has also not been confirmed, although the story attracted attention on October 11.
However, the incident developed into a public controversy after Banshi published footage of the encounter. He titled the recording “Thailand Good Police Say Get Out of The Temple Now || First Bad Experience In Thailand Temple”. The wording placed his treatment at the temple at the centre of the story. In particular, his description of the encounter as his first bad experience attracted criticism from viewers.
Thai and Indian viewers criticise demands for free temple lodging while others praise police response
Some questioned why he expected a Buddhist temple to provide accommodation simply because he wanted to avoid spending money. Others focused on his decision to enter Thailand without sufficient funds for ordinary travel expenses.
Meanwhile, several viewers praised the police response, pointing to the offer of a ฿400 hotel room. The controversy developed into a dispute over foreign visitors seeking free accommodation at religious institutions.
One commenter argued that travellers should respect local communities and avoid sleeping in public places without permission. The same commenter suggested that visitors unable to afford accommodation should reconsider their travel arrangements.
Another viewer praised the officers for treating the Indian traveller politely. That commenter pointed out that police offered an inexpensive alternative rather than simply ordering him away. Furthermore, the viewer argued that Buddhist temples were places of worship, not free campsites for foreign travellers.
The criticism was not confined to Thai viewers. Notably, some commenters identifying themselves as Indian nationals or members of Thailand’s Indian community also criticised his conduct. They expressed concern that his actions could reinforce negative stereotypes about Indian tourists.
Criticism grows as Banshi’s videos reveal a travel strategy relying on strangers and free shelter
Others urged him to consider the reputation of fellow Indian travellers when publishing such encounters. However, the available reports do not establish how many comments were posted or what proportion supported Banshi.
Nor do the reports provide verified viewing figures for the controversial video. Nevertheless, the reactions centred on two elements of the encounter. Banshi sought free accommodation at the temple. Subsequently, he refused a commercial alternative costing approximately ฿400.
The refusal attracted attention because police had offered to assist him in reaching the hotel. Instead, he chose another location where he hoped to sleep without paying.
The traveller’s approach was not an isolated decision made during his visit to Udon Thani. Indeed, his YouTube channel openly promotes a lifestyle based on hitchhiking and avoiding conventional travel expenses.
The channel, Anything Banshi, is available under the handle @AnythingBanshi1791. Its description introduces Banshi as a young Indian traveller who chose dreams over degrees and freedom over fear. He presents his journeys as an alternative to conventional education, employment and financial ambitions.
Banshi describes 5,000 kilometres of hitchhiking across India and a 69-day journey through the northeast
According to his channel description, he began hitchhiking across India in 2026. He claims to have travelled more than 5,000 kilometres without using public transport or staying in hotels.
Instead, he says he relies on strangers’ kindness, tents and improvised sleeping arrangements. His accommodation has included bus stations, petrol stations and mountainous locations. Significantly, the channel description presents discomfort and uncertainty as central features of his travel experiences.
Banshi uses the phrase “comfort kills stories” to explain his approach. He also describes completing a 69-day journey through northeast India. During that expedition, he says he stayed with local residents while documenting communities and places encountered along the way.
Furthermore, he promotes his videos to young viewers who feel uncertain about conventional careers and education. His stated philosophy places personal experiences, travel and encounters above money, qualifications and employment.
Consequently, his attempt to sleep at the Udon Thani temple was consistent with the travelling methods described on his channel. However, his statements about travelling without money do not independently establish his financial circumstances.
Banshi’s finances remain unverified as the case highlights bigger Indian channels and budget travel
There is no verified information showing how much money he possessed when police approached him. Likewise, the available material does not establish his income from YouTube or other sources. His subscriber count and video catalogue establish the scale of his online activity, not his personal wealth.
Nevertheless, his declared approach involves deliberately avoiding paid accommodation and relying on assistance from people encountered during his travels. That distinction is relevant to the circumstances surrounding the Udon Thani incident.
Banshi’s channel describes free or improvised accommodation as an established feature of his journeys. Moreover, the incident has drawn attention to a wider category of Indian YouTubers producing unconventional travel content.
These creators document hitchhiking, journeys on limited budgets and experiences outside established tourist routes. Some have attracted substantial audiences by presenting travel without conventional accommodation or transport arrangements.
One prominent Indian travel creator is Bansi Bishnoi, whose YouTube channel has approximately 1.25 million subscribers. Third-party channel statistics dated October 2026 also indicate nearly 296 million cumulative views. His audience demonstrates the substantial reach achieved by Indian travel content on YouTube.
Anything Banshi’s 17,300 subscribers contrast with Bansi Bishnoi’s million-plus audience on YouTube
In contrast, Anything Banshi has approximately 17,300 subscribers and 458 published videos. The difference is considerable. Bishnoi’s reported audience is more than 70 times larger than Banshi’s.
However, both operate within the wider Indian travel-video market, where unconventional journeys form part of the attraction. The success of larger channels also demonstrates the audience available to smaller creators producing similar material.
Nevertheless, there is no confirmed evidence that Banshi directly copied Bishnoi’s travelling methods or based his venture on him. The two men are separate individuals, despite similarities in their names, appearance and travel-related content.
Indeed, those similarities have caused confusion when identifying the YouTuber involved in the Udon Thani incident. Bansi Bishnoi was not the traveller removed from the temple. Instead, the man featured in the controversial recording operates the Anything Banshi channel.
His 458 videos indicate an extensive catalogue documenting his activities. Furthermore, his account describes a sustained programme of hitchhiking rather than a single experimental journey.
The temple incident has now brought that approach into contact with the rules governing a Thai religious institution. In Udon Thani, the temple committee did not permit the Indian visitor to remain overnight. Police subsequently supported that decision and instructed him to leave.
Police offer accommodation but no charges follow, while the traveller’s immigration status remains unknown
However, officers also attempted to resolve the immediate accommodation problem. They offered assistance in finding a nearby hotel costing approximately ฿400. The traveller refused, despite being informed that he could not remain at the temple.
Consequently, he moved to a petrol station to spend the night. The available reports do not establish whether petrol station staff subsequently permitted him to sleep there. Nor do they confirm where he eventually spent the entire night.
Similarly, there is no information establishing whether he contacted immigration officers or sought other accommodation afterwards. The published accounts also provide no evidence that he committed a criminal offence during the temple encounter. There has been no reported arrest, prosecution or immigration action connected with the incident. Furthermore, his visa status and entry arrangements have not been disclosed.
Thailand maintains immigration entry requirements for foreign visitors, including provisions concerning adequate financial means. However, the temple incident alone does not establish that Banshi breached those requirements.
The available reports do not confirm whether immigration officials have examined his financial circumstances. Nor is there evidence that police investigated his immigration status during the encounter. Instead, the documented intervention concerned permission to stay overnight at the temple.
Temple refusal sparks online scrutiny but police reports show no arrest, expulsion or a criminal charge
The temple representatives refused that permission, while police sought to arrange alternative accommodation. The distinction is central to the events captured in the traveller’s video. He was not expelled from Thailand or taken into police custody.
Rather, he was instructed to leave a religious property where overnight accommodation had been refused. The offer of a budget hotel also contradicts any suggestion that officers simply abandoned him without assistance.
According to the reported account, police expressed concern for his safety and advised him about continuing his journey. Nevertheless, Banshi subsequently presented the incident online as his first bad experience at a Thai temple. That description became a focal point for criticism from Thai and Indian viewers. The online reaction also placed his wider travelling methods under scrutiny.
His approach depends on obtaining assistance from strangers while avoiding ordinary accommodation expenses. In India, according to his own account, that approach has supported thousands of kilometres of hitchhiking. In Thailand, however, his attempt to stay at the Udon Thani temple ended with police intervention. Temple representatives declined to provide overnight accommodation, and officers instructed him to leave.
Banshi’s petrol station move closes temple encounter as online criticism spreads beyond Thailand
The Indian traveller then rejected the proposed hotel arrangement and moved to a petrol station. Meanwhile, the resulting video attracted criticism over his expectations and the way he described the encounter.
The controversy has also exposed confusion between Banshi and the considerably more prominent Indian YouTuber Bansi Bishnoi. However, the Udon Thani incident involves the smaller Anything Banshi channel, not Bishnoi’s million-subscriber operation.
Blunder over Indian visa policy saw Thailand lose tourists in August. Quick volte face to a 30 day visa
For over 2 weeks YouTuber Hlun Solo lay dead in Tbilisi while Thai officials and his family knew nothing
As of October 11, no further police proceedings or immigration investigation had been established in the available reports. The central facts remain unchanged. Banshi sought free accommodation, police ordered him to leave, and he refused a ฿400 hotel. Instead, he chose to spend the night at a petrol station. His subsequent video transformed the encounter into an online controversy, attracting criticism from both Thai and Indian viewers.
Join the Thai News forum, follow Thai Examiner on Facebook here
Follow Thai Examiner on Google here
Receive all our stories as they come out on Telegram here
Follow Thai Examiner here
Further reading:
60-day visa regime to be ended confirms Minister responding to rising industry security concerns
Tourism boss warns Thailand it is facing a Chinese blacklist if another security controversy erupts