Forbes' highest-paid entertainers, from Oprah to Beyoncé

Forbes spent more than two decades keeping a running tally of who in show business made the most money, publishing it as the Celebrity 100 before folding the franchise into broader coverage of the world's highest-paid entertainers. The method stayed consistent: estimate pretax earnings over a 12-month window, drawing on touring grosses, film and television salaries, endorsement contracts, and the side businesses stars built alongside their creative work. The magazine retired the ranking as a standalone annual package after 2020. The names that topped it remain one of the clearest public records of how celebrity converts into capital.

Read across the years, those rankings tell a consistent story: the largest paydays almost never came from a single paycheck. A platinum album or a franchise role opened the door, but the money arrived through what a performer built around that fame — a sneaker line, a tequila brand, a production company, a stadium tour stretched across two years. Kanye West led Forbes' 2020 celebrity ranking on the strength of his Adidas partnership rather than record sales. George Clooney posted one of the largest single-year totals the magazine ever recorded for an actor in a year he did not open a major film, because he had sold a spirits company. That pattern recurs across enough years and enough careers to function as a business model rather than an accounting quirk.

This list revisits 10 entertainers whose Forbes-documented earnings or wealth milestones mark the outer edge of what the industry pays. The roster spans formats and eras: musicians whose tour grosses ran into the hundreds of millions, actors whose ownership stakes dwarfed their film fees, a rapper the magazine named hip-hop's first billionaire, and a talk show host who controlled her own production company at a time when on-camera talent rarely did. Some reached the top once, in a year defined by a single transaction. Others held position across multiple release cycles, or across decades. Taken together, the entries explain why "entertainer" on a Forbes scorecard has long described something closer to an entrepreneur who happens to perform.

Illustration: Quartz

Kanye West, now known as Ye, topped Forbes' 2020 ranking of the world's highest-paid celebrities with estimated pretax earnings of $170 million, nearly all of it traced to his Yeezy sneaker and apparel partnership with Adidas rather than albums, streaming, or live performance.

The figure rested on a valuation of West's stake in the Yeezy line, which by then ranked among the few non-athlete sneaker brands operating at the commercial scale of signature lines from Nike $NKE or Jordan Brand. Adidas signed him in 2013, after his earlier Nike collaboration on the Air Yeezy ended, and the deal compounded in value as the shoes became a resale market staple trading well above retail.

The source of the money is what set the ranking apart within Forbes' own archive. West had spent years building Yeezy as a business separate from his recording career at Def Jam and his G.O.O.D. Music imprint, with its own design operation and manufacturing handled through Adidas. The shoes were not tour merchandise sold at a venue table. They were a product line with a supply chain behind it, and in 2020 that line paid its founder more than most touring musicians or franchise actors made from every income stream combined.

The arrangement did not last. Adidas ended the partnership in October 2022 after West made antisemitic remarks in public, and the company later said the lost sales and unsold Yeezy inventory cut hundreds of millions of euros from its results. Adidas went on to sell the remaining stock and directed part of the proceeds to organizations that fight discrimination, including the Anti-Defamation League.

That ending makes the 2020 total a snapshot rather than a baseline. It remains one of the clearest cases in Forbes' entertainer coverage of a licensing deal outearning the creative work that made the deal possible, and it moved the ceiling on what a single-year celebrity earnings estimate could look like.

Illustration: Quartz

Taylor Swift topped Forbes' celebrity earnings ranking twice, in 2016 and again in 2019. The 2019 estimate came to $185 million, driven chiefly by her Reputation Stadium Tour. Two chart-topping years, three years apart, made her the rare performer whose peak was not a one-off.

The first came after the 1989 World Tour, an arena and stadium run supporting an album that sold millions of copies in the U.S. alone. Forbes put her earnings that year at $170 million. The second arrived out of a more complicated business. Reputation Stadium Tour finished as the highest-grossing U.S. tour on record at the time it closed. Swift's income that year also reflected a new recording agreement with Republic Records and Universal Music Group, signed after her deal with Big Machine Label Group ended. That same year, Big Machine sold the masters to her first six albums, triggering a public dispute over who controlled her early catalog.

Her entries differ from most others Forbes tracked in where the money originated. Swift's biggest years traced to live performance and recorded music, not a sneaker line or a liquor brand sold to a conglomerate. The revenue came from the core creative work, scaled up through stadium capacity and ticket pricing.

The Eras Tour, which ran from 2023 into 2024, operated at a larger scale still and pushed Swift past the billion-dollar threshold in Forbes' net worth estimates. She reached that mark primarily through touring income and ownership of her music, including the re-recorded versions of those early albums she released to replace the masters she did not own.

By the time of that tour, Forbes had stopped publishing its single combined celebrity earnings list. The Eras figures surfaced instead through separate wealth and touring coverage rather than the ranking that crowned her twice. The underlying pattern held: a major tour, a major payday, then the same formula repeated years later at far bigger scale.

Illustration: Quartz

George Clooney's biggest earnings year came from tequila, not film. Forbes put his 2018 total at $239 million, almost all of it from the sale of Casamigos, the spirits brand he co-founded, to the British drinks group Diageo.

Clooney started Casamigos in 2013 with Rande Gerber, a nightlife entrepreneur, and Mike Meldman, a real estate developer. The three made the tequila for their own use before turning it into a commercial product. The name translates roughly as "house of friends," and the marketing leaned on that origin story rather than on heritage distilling credentials.

Diageo announced the acquisition in June 2017 in a deal valued at up to $1 billion — $700 million paid upfront, with the remaining $300 million tied to performance targets over 10 years. Split three ways and stretched across an earnout, the proceeds still produced a payout no film salary could approach. The timing put the money inside the 12-month window Forbes used to build its 2018 actor ranking.

Clooney had spent two decades as a leading man who could open a studio picture, commanding eight-figure fees on the Ocean's films along with profit participation on other projects. One beverage sale outpaced what any of that generated in a single accounting year.

No major Clooney release drove the 2018 figure. His largest payday as an entertainer had nothing to do with entertaining, which is the part of the ranking worth sitting with.

Casamigos also set a template. Celebrity-backed spirits were not new, but the size and structure of the Diageo transaction showed what a founder's stake could be worth once paired with global distribution. Diageo, which also owns Johnnie Walker and Don Julio, was buying shelf position in the expanding U.S. premium tequila category as much as it was buying a famous name. Clooney's $239 million remains one of the largest single-year totals Forbes ever recorded for an actor, and it came from a sale rather than a year of work.

Illustration: Quartz

Dwayne Johnson led Forbes' highest-paid actor ranking in consecutive years, with estimated earnings of $89.4 million in 2019 and $87.5 million in 2020. The money arrived through three channels rather than one: studio fees for franchise films, equity in the projects his production company developed, and a signature apparel line.

The film income traced largely to the Fast & Furious series, where he played Luke Hobbs across multiple installments and the 2019 spinoff Hobbs & Shaw, and to the Jumanji sequels opposite Kevin Hart, Jack Black and Karen Gillan. He also starred in Disney $DIS's Jungle Cruise. Actors at that tier negotiate an upfront salary plus backend participation, meaning a share of a film's revenue after certain thresholds, which can exceed the base fee on a picture that performs well internationally.

Seven Bucks Productions, the company he co-founded with Dany Garcia, changed the arithmetic further. Producing a project rather than simply appearing in it gives a performer a claim on the production itself, including television series made for networks and streaming platforms. The HBO series Ballers, in which he starred and which Seven Bucks produced, is one example of that dual role.

His partnership with Under Armour $UAA produced Project Rock, a line of training footwear and apparel carrying his name. He later launched the energy drink brand Zoa and, with Garcia and RedBird Capital, bought the XFL football league out of bankruptcy in 2020, extending the same ownership logic beyond apparel.

What separates Johnson's case from most entries in these rankings is durability. The top actor spot usually rotates with whoever happened to open a blockbuster that year, and a performer who reaches it on the back of one franchise peak often drops off the following year. Johnson held his position by stacking revenue that did not depend on a single release date, a structure that became standard practice among A-list performers through the 2010s.

Illustration: Quartz

Elton John ranked among the highest-paid musicians Forbes tracked in 2019, with estimated earnings of about $84 million generated almost entirely by his Farewell Yellow Brick Road tour. No new album sat behind the figure, no apparel line and no company sale — the money came from tickets to a show drawing on 50 years of catalog.

John announced the tour in January 2018 and presented it as his final extended run of road dates, routing it across several years and multiple continents before it closed in Stockholm in July 2023. By then it ranked among the highest-grossing concert tours ever staged. The farewell framing carried commercial weight: audiences who had been able to catch him on tour for decades were handed an end date, and ticket pricing reflected that.

Veteran acts have used the same premise before. Cher and Kiss each built multi-year farewell runs around a stated finish, which supported premium pricing and longer routing than a standard tour would sustain. John's version ran at larger scale, playing arenas and stadiums across North America, Europe, Australia and Asia rather than concentrating on a few core markets.

His earnings profile that year looked unlike most of the names at the top of Forbes' rankings. The income traced to live performance revenue rather than equity in an outside company or a licensing agreement, which makes him one of the clearest examples of the traditional route to a large annual figure. The catalog did the work — "Rocket Man," "Tiny Dancer," "Your Song," "Bennie and the Jets" — songs cut in the 1970s still filling rooms five decades later.

The 2019 total also arrived during renewed attention to his life and music. The biopic "Rocketman," starring Taron Egerton, opened that May. It did not generate the earnings, but it helped keep the tour in front of ticket buyers across a long sales window.

Illustration: Quartz

Ed Sheeran ranked among the world's highest-paid musicians in 2019 on the strength of his Divide tour, which ran from March 2017 to August 2019 and closed as the highest-grossing concert tour on record at that point. Forbes estimated his earnings for the year at roughly $110 million, nearly all of it from live performance rather than an outside company.

The economics of the run separated it from almost every other stadium production of its era. Sheeran played alone, with an acoustic guitar and a loop pedal, stacking rhythm parts and harmonies onstage instead of fronting a band. No dancers, no backing musicians on payroll, no set changes between songs. A stadium show staged that way carries far lower production and crew costs than a conventional one, so a larger share of every ticket sold reaches the performer instead of covering overhead. Gross receipts tell only part of the story in touring; what decides an earnings ranking is what remains once trucking, staging and crew wages are paid.

His income in those years also drew on songwriting, a revenue line many touring acts lack. Sheeran has written and co-written material recorded by other performers, including Justin Bieber's "Love Yourself," and those publishing royalties accrue whether or not he is on the road or releasing an album.

That mix explains his placement alongside entertainers whose peak years traced back to brand sales or product lines. Sheeran's number rested on ticket volume and a lean cost structure rather than equity in a company he could sell. The tour played more than 250 dates across North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, Latin America and South Africa, and Billboard's Boxscore tally put its cumulative gross above $775 million, passing U2's 360° Tour for the all-time record.

It also made a point about scale in live music. One performer with minimal staging could fill the same venues as acts traveling with crews of 50 or more, and keep considerably more of what those venues produced.

Illustration: Quartz

Forbes named Jay-Z hip-hop's first billionaire in 2019, a designation built on accumulated net worth rather than a single year of earnings. The estimate counted holdings across music, spirits, art, real estate, and technology, assembled over roughly three decades instead of banked in one transaction.

The valuation included his recorded music catalog and his stake in Roc Nation, the entertainment company he launched in 2008, along with ownership positions in the champagne label Armand de Brignac and the cognac brand D'Ussé. Art and property added to the total. Shawn Carter, to use his birth name, had spent years routing advances and endorsement money into equity rather than collecting flat fees, and that choice is what separated his balance sheet from other artists with comparable record sales.

The liquor holdings carried the most weight. He bought Armand de Brignac outright and later sold a 50% interest to Moët Hennessy in 2021, while D'Ussé operated as a joint venture with Bacardi, which eventually bought out his share. He also sold a majority stake in the streaming service Tidal to Square $SQ, the payments company renamed Block later that same year. An early position in Uber $UBER, taken before the ride-hailing firm listed publicly, had appreciated sharply by the time of its 2019 IPO.

Roc Nation outgrew its original role as a label and management shop. It moved into sports representation, signing athletes across multiple leagues, and struck a partnership with the NFL covering live entertainment and social justice programming.

The gap between this entry and the annual earnings lists matters for reading the rankings correctly. Forbes' Celebrity 100 measured income inside a 12-month window. The billionaire calculation measured what was left after years of acquisitions, exits, and appreciation. A performer can post a nine-figure earnings year and still sit well short of 10 figures in net worth. Jay-Z crossed the threshold during a stretch when his touring schedule and release pace had both slowed, which separates what an entertainer earns from what an entertainer owns.

Illustration: Quartz

Oprah Winfrey appeared near the top of Forbes' entertainer earnings rankings across the 1990s and 2000s more consistently than anyone else the magazine covered. The reason was ownership rather than salary. She controlled Harpo Productions, the company behind The Oprah Winfrey Show, so she captured the syndication economics instead of drawing a host's fee from a network.

That structure was unusual when she secured it. Most daytime hosts worked under contract to a studio or network that owned the program and kept the licensing revenue. Winfrey's arrangement, formalized in the late 1980s, gave her control of the show she fronted. It ran from 1986 to 2011, licensed to local television stations nationwide, generating station fees and advertising revenue that flowed back through her company rather than someone else's.

Steady syndication income gave her a different earnings profile from the musicians and actors who surrounded her on those lists. A touring artist's biggest year depends on whether a tour is running. An actor's depends on release schedules. Winfrey's show delivered comparable numbers every year it aired, which is why her name recurred across rankings rather than spiking once. Forbes identified her as the first Black woman billionaire in 2003, a threshold she crossed while the program was still in production.

She extended the model past the talk show. Harpo produced other television properties, she took an ownership interest in the cable channel Oxygen, and in 2011 she launched OWN, the Oprah Winfrey Network, as a joint venture with Discovery Communications. Her 2015 purchase of a stake in Weight Watchers, paired with a role promoting the company, tied part of her wealth to a publicly traded stock whose value moved independently of anything she produced.

The template she established — hold equity in the thing you star in — later became standard practice. The production companies that A-list actors founded through the 2010s and 2020s, including Dwayne Johnson's Seven Bucks Productions, follow the same logic she applied to daytime television decades earlier.

Illustration: Quartz

Beyoncé's Renaissance World Tour grossed more than $500 million across its 2023 run, making it the highest-grossing tour of her career and one of the largest ever staged by a solo artist.

The run opened in Stockholm in May 2023 and closed in Kansas City that October, covering stadiums across Europe and North America in support of her 2022 album "Renaissance." Ticket prices ran well above the touring average. Premium options — floor packages, early-entry bundles, VIP seating — pushed the per-seat take higher still. That structure is now standard at the top of the live business. A small group of acts can fill stadiums on consecutive nights, and those acts price accordingly.

Merchandise formed a second revenue line. Stadium runs of this size sell apparel at the venue and through an online store timed to each city's dates, and how much of that reaches the headliner depends on how much of the design and production she controls.

Beyoncé also kept ownership of the tour's filmed output. "Renaissance: A Film by Beyoncé" opened in theaters in December 2023 under a distribution deal with AMC Theatres, the same route Taylor Swift had taken weeks earlier with her Eras Tour film. Instead of licensing footage to a studio for a flat fee, Beyoncé held the rights and took a share of ticket sales. She had worked a version of that model before with "Homecoming," the 2019 Netflix $NFLX documentary built around her 2018 Coachella headlining set.

What sets her case apart from the other touring entries here is the degree of vertical control. The album, the tour, the concert film and the merchandise all moved through Parkwood Entertainment, the company she founded in 2010. Each piece promoted the next. The money stayed inside a structure she owned rather than splitting among outside labels, studios and distributors.