For decades, public discourse has repeatedly called for functional education. Governments advocate it. Universities proclaim it. Employers demand it. Development agencies finance it. International organisations recommend it. Yet surprisingly little attention has been paid to defining what functionality itself actually means. Functional for whom and for what purposes?
These questions deserve careful consideration because they expose a fundamental misconception that has shaped educational debates in many developing countries. The problem confronting Nigerian education is often presented as though education has somehow ceased to be functional, thereby implying that earlier educational systems possessed some superior practical orientation that has since been lost. History suggests otherwise.
Indeed, throughout human civilization, education has never existed as an end in itself. Rather, it has always served as society’s principal mechanism for transmitting the knowledge, values, skills and competencies necessary for survival, continuity and development. Émile Durkheim (1922), the French sociologist famously argued that education is the means by which society reproduces itself across generations. Theodore Schultz (1961) later demonstrated that education constitutes investment in human capital, while Gary Becker (1964) established that the knowledge and skills acquired through education significantly enhance both individual productivity and national economic performance. It is perhaps the distinguished American educational philosopher John Dewey that captures the idea most succinctly when he observed that “education is a social process; education is growth; education is not preparation for life but life itself” (Dewey, 1916). His insight remains remarkably relevant today because it reminds us that education cannot be separated from the society whose future it seeks to shape. Dewey’s implication, for emphasis, is that education is a continuous process through which individuals acquire the capacities required for effective participation in society.
History abundantly confirms these propositions. The apprenticeship systems of pre-colonial African societies were functional because they produced farmers, blacksmiths, hunters, craftsmen, traders, healers and community leaders capable of sustaining their societies. Classical Greek education was functional because it prepared citizens for participation in the political life of the city-state. The medieval universities of Europe were functional because they trained clergy, jurists and administrators required by church and state. The Industrial Revolution transformed educational systems once again, producing engineers, scientists, accountants and industrial managers whose expertise powered modern manufacturing economies. Every age has designed its educational institutions according to its dominant developmental priorities. Put differently, education cannot be separated from the society whose present and future it seeks to shape.
The issue before Nigeria, therefore, is not whether our education should become functional. It already is. The crucial question is whether it remains functionally aligned with the developmental realities of twenty-first century Nigeria and Africa at large.
That question becomes even more urgent when viewed against the backdrop of today’s rapidly changing global economy. We are living through what Klaus Schwab (2016), the founder and former executive chairman of the World Economic Forum describes as the Fourth Industrial Revolution—a period characterised by artificial intelligence, robotics, biotechnology, advanced manufacturing, quantum computing, big data, renewable energy, digital platforms and unprecedented technological convergence. Simultaneously, the global economy is shifting from dependence on natural resources toward the primacy of knowledge, innovation and human capital (World Bank, 2019; OECD, 2019).
Consequently, the wealth of nations is increasingly determined not by what lies beneath their soil but by what resides within the knowledge, creativity and innovative capacities of their people. Countries that have achieved remarkable developmental transformations over the past half-century did so not because they possessed exceptional mineral resources but because they deliberately invested in education systems designed to produce strategic human capital capable of driving industrialisation, technological innovation and national competitiveness (World Bank, 1993; OECD, 2019). Singapore transformed from a resource-poor trading port into a global economic powerhouse through education, skills, technology, infrastructure and innovation. South Korea converted limited natural-resource endowments into industrial strength through education, engineering, science and export-oriented manufacturing. Japan built technological excellence by mastering the transformation of imported materials into high-value products, while Switzerland created global competitiveness through specialised knowledge, precision manufacturing, pharmaceuticals and advanced services.
The cases of Taiwan, Finland and Ireland are equally thought-provoking. Taiwan turned human capital and technological expertise into global leadership in semiconductors, while Israel transformed scarcity into innovation in agriculture, water, medicine and technology. Finland, despite having a relatively small population and limited extractive-resource advantages, built a highly educated and technologically sophisticated economy through sustained investment in education, research, innovation and digital capabilities. Ireland similarly transformed from a relatively poor European economy into a high-income, export-oriented knowledge economy by investing in education, skills, technology and its capacity to attract, develop and retain high-value industries.
Nigeria stands today at precisely such a historical crossroads. Our competitive advantages—vibrant youth population, abundant natural resources and entrepreneurial capacity, among others—offer enormous developmental possibilities. Yet these advantages can become liabilities if our educational institutions fail to produce graduates equipped for the demands of the knowledge economy. As the World Economic Forum (2025) continues to emphasize, future prosperity will depend less on routine knowledge and increasingly on complex problem-solving capacity, creativity, adaptability, digital competence, ethical reasoning and lifelong learning.
The central argument of this lecture is both straightforward and compelling: education has always been functional, but the enduring challenge for Nigeria is to more functionally align such education to her developmental needs. If national renewal is to move from political rhetoric to reality, then higher education must deliberately reposition itself as the principal engine for developing the strategic human capital required to build an innovative, productive, globally competitive and socially cohesive Nigerian nation.
It is this proposition that shall guide our reflections today.
The Twenty-First Century Imperative: Repositioning Higher Education for Strategic Human Capital Development
If history teaches us that every generation redesigns its educational system to meet its developmental priorities, then our generation confronts perhaps the most profound educational transition since the Industrial Revolution. The world is experiencing an unprecedented convergence of technological, economic and social transformations that are fundamentally redefining the nature of work, production, governance and human interaction. Artificial Intelligence, robotics, biotechnology, advanced manufacturing, quantum computing, big data, renewable energy, digital finance, the Internet of Things and the platform economy are no longer futuristic concepts; they are the defining realities of contemporary civilization.
These developments carry profound implications for higher education. Universities and polytechnics can no longer define success merely by the number of graduates they produce or the certificates they award. The more important question is whether their graduates possess the knowledge, skills, dispositions and practical competencies required to create value in an increasingly knowledge-driven, technology-enabled and globally competitive economy. We have, in the foregoing, cited compelling national examples which demonstrate that in the twenty-first century, the decisive question is not simply what resources a country possesses, but how effectively it develops the human capabilities required to convert knowledge, technology and resources into sustained economic and social value.
For Nigeria, this challenge is particularly significant. Ours is one of the world’s youngest populations, endowed with immense entrepreneurial energy and demographic potential. Yet this demographic advantage can become a demographic burden if educational institutions continue to produce graduates whose knowledge and skills are poorly aligned with the demands of contemporary society. Graduate unemployment, underemployment and persistent skills mismatches are not simply labour market problems; they are indicators of a disconnect between educational outcomes and national development needs.
This is why the conversation about functional education must move beyond employability in the narrow sense of securing jobs. The true purpose of higher education is not merely to prepare graduates to seek employment but to equip them to create knowledge, generate innovation, solve problems, establish enterprises, strengthen institutions and improve society. The graduates required by Nigeria today are not simply job seekers; they must become job creators, innovators, ethical leaders and productive citizens capable of driving economic transformation.
Accordingly, strategic human capital development must become the organising philosophy of Nigerian higher education. Strategic human capital refers not merely to educated people but to individuals whose knowledge, competencies, values and creative capacities are deliberately developed to advance clearly defined national priorities. It is the quality of human capital—not simply its quantity—that distinguishes prosperous nations from struggling ones.
In practical terms, this demands that our universities and polytechnics produce graduates who combine five interrelated competencies.
First, they must possess technical and professional competence. Every graduate must demonstrate mastery of the knowledge, practical skills and professional standards required within his or her discipline. Excellence in engineering, medicine, law, agriculture, education, business, computing and the humanities remains the indispensable foundation of national development.
Second, graduates must develop innovation and problem-solving capacity. The complex challenges confronting Nigeria—from food insecurity and energy deficits to healthcare, infrastructure, environmental sustainability and digital transformation—cannot be solved through routine thinking. Higher education must therefore cultivate creativity, research capability, design thinking and interdisciplinary collaboration so that graduates become solution providers rather than passive recipients of knowledge.
Third, institutions must intentionally nurture entrepreneurial competence. Entrepreneurship should no longer be viewed as an optional course added to existing curricula but as a philosophy that encourages initiative, opportunity recognition, resilience, value creation and responsible risk-taking. A truly functional educational system should produce graduates capable not only of fitting into existing industries but also of creating entirely new enterprises that expand employment and national productivity.
Fourth, graduates must acquire digital literacy and technological adaptability. In an era characterized by rapid technological change, digital competence has become as fundamental as literacy itself. Beyond the ability to use digital tools, graduates must understand data, artificial intelligence, automation, cybersecurity and emerging technologies sufficiently to adapt continuously throughout their professional lives. Since technologies evolve faster than curricula, institutions must prioritize learning agility over static content.
Finally, functional education in the twenty-first century must cultivate ethical leadership and civic responsibility. Technological sophistication without moral responsibility cannot produce sustainable national development. The most advanced economies are sustained not only by innovation but also by institutions built upon integrity, accountability, social trust, respect for the rule of law and responsible citizenship. Nigerian higher education must therefore produce graduates who possess both intellectual excellence and moral character.
These competencies are neither abstract aspirations nor isolated educational objectives. Together, they constitute the strategic human capital required for national renewal. They define the kind of graduate capable of leading Nigeria through the opportunities and disruptions of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
Consequently, functional education in our time must be understood not simply as practical education but as education deliberately aligned with the contemporary developmental needs of society. It is education that anticipates future realities rather than merely responds to present demands; education that prepares graduates not only for existing occupations but also for professions yet to emerge; education that connects knowledge with productivity, innovation with enterprise, technology with ethical responsibility, and scholarship with national transformation.
If the twentieth century rewarded nations rich in natural resources, the twenty-first century increasingly rewards nations rich in ideas, innovation and human capability. Even heavily endowed nations understand this reality, and are articulating modalities for a transition. Perhaps the United Arab Emirates provides a most striking model for Nigeria: possessing substantial petroleum wealth, the UAE has increasingly deployed that wealth to build world-class infrastructure, human capability and a diversified economy in which trade, logistics, aviation, tourism, finance, manufacturing and other knowledge- and service-driven activities play major roles. Nigeria’s greatest resource at this point in its existence is therefore neither oil nor minerals nor land. It is the intelligence, creativity and productive capacity of her people. The central responsibility of higher education is to develop that resource strategically, deliberately and sustainably.
That, ultimately, is what functional education must mean in our own generation.
Education and the Nigerian Project: Functional to Every Age
Having established that education has never existed independently of society, we may now return to the central question posed at the beginning of this lecture: Functional Education and to what?
The answer, I submit, is both historical and straightforward. Education is functional to the developmental priorities of every age. Every society consciously or unconsciously designs its educational institutions to produce the kinds of knowledge, skills, values and competencies required to address its most pressing social, political and economic challenges. Consequently, the history of education is, in many respects, the history of society itself.
Nigeria presents an excellent illustration of this principle. From the colonial period to the present democratic era, the objectives, curriculum and structure of higher education have consistently evolved in response to changing national priorities. What has changed over time is not the functionality of education, but the developmental mission it has been expected to fulfil.
1. 1932–1960: Colonial Administration, Constitutional Development and Preparation for Self-Government
Modern higher education in Nigeria developed principally to serve the administrative requirements of the colonial state. Institutions such as Yaba Higher College, established in 1932, and later University College, Ibadan, founded in 1948, were designed primarily to produce the skilled manpower required for the expanding colonial bureaucracy and essential public services (Fafunwa, 1974). The educational emphasis was therefore on teacher education, agriculture, medicine, law, public administration and the liberal arts.
As constitutional reforms accelerated after the Richards Constitution of 1946, followed by the Macpherson Constitution of 1951 and the Lyttleton Constitution of 1954, education assumed an additional responsibility: preparing Nigerians for political leadership and eventual self-government. Universities increasingly became centers for producing administrators, lawyers, economists, journalists and political leaders who would eventually assume responsibility for governing an independent nation.
In this period, therefore, education was unquestionably functional—not to industrialization or digital technology—but primarily to colonial administration, constitutional evolution and political transition.
2. 1960–1975: Nation-Building, Africanization and Institutional Consolidation
Political independence fundamentally altered Nigeria’s educational priorities. The new nation inherited political sovereignty but lacked sufficient indigenous professionals to replace expatriates who had dominated virtually every sector of national life.
Consequently, higher education became the principal instrument for nation-building and Africanization. Universities expanded rapidly to produce Nigerian doctors, engineers, architects, teachers, scientists, lawyers, diplomats, military officers and public administrators capable of managing the institutions of the newly independent state. The landmark Ashby Commission Report (1960) anticipated this challenge and recommended substantial expansion of higher education to meet the manpower needs of an independent Nigeria.
Education during this era therefore served a different historical purpose. It was no longer primarily preparing clerks for colonial administration; it was producing nation-builders responsible for consolidating political independence and constructing indigenous institutions capable of sustaining national development.
3. 1975–1999: Industrialization, Technological Advancement and Economic Development
The oil boom of the 1970s introduced another shift in national priorities. Flush with unprecedented petroleum revenues, Nigeria embraced industrialization as the pathway to economic transformation. Manufacturing, steel production, petroleum engineering, energy development, construction and technological capacity became central national aspirations.
Predictably, educational policy responded. The Federal Government established new universities, polytechnics and colleges of technology while placing increasing emphasis on engineering, applied sciences, technical education and vocational training. The National Policy on Education (1977) reflected this renewed commitment to science, technology and practical skills as instruments of national development.
The rapid expansion of polytechnic education during this period was therefore neither accidental nor merely administrative. It reflected recognition that industrial development required technicians, technologists and middle-level manpower in addition to university-trained professionals.
Again, education remained thoroughly functional—this time to industrialization, technological advancement and economic growth.
4. 1999–2025: Democratization, Educational Expansion and Wider Access
The return to democratic governance in 1999 ushered in yet another educational paradigm. Democratization, population growth, globalization and increasing demand for university education placed unprecedented pressure on Nigeria’s higher education system.
Government policy therefore concentrated on expanding access through the establishment of new federal, state and private universities, additional polytechnics and colleges of education. Simultaneously, educational reforms increasingly emphasized quality assurance, accreditation, entrepreneurship education, information and communication technology, institutional autonomy and international competitiveness.
This period also witnessed growing recognition that educational attainment alone could no longer guarantee employment. Consequently, entrepreneurship, innovation and employability gradually became central themes within educational policy, anticipating today’s broader conversation about graduate skills and labour market relevance.
The Historical Lesson
What conclusions emerge from this brief historical survey?
The first is that Nigerian education has never been static. Every generation has redesigned its educational system in response to prevailing national circumstances.
The second is that education has always been functional. During the colonial period, it served administrative governance. After independence, it became an instrument of nation-building. During the industrial era, it supplied technical manpower for economic development. During the democratic era, it expanded access while supporting institutional growth, entrepreneurship and broader participation in higher education.
Therefore, the current demand for functional education should not be understood as a rejection of previous educational philosophies. Rather, it represents the latest stage in a long historical tradition whereby education continuously reinvents itself to address society’s changing developmental priorities.
Our challenge today, therefore, is not to invent functional education. History has already accomplished that. Our responsibility is to redefine functionality for the realities of the twenty-first century. If previous generations required education for colonial administration, nation-building and industrialization, our generation requires education capable of producing strategic human capital for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the digital economy, sustainable development and global competitiveness.
That, I submit, is the next frontier of the Nigerian Project.
Entrepreneurship, Innovation and the Knowledge Economy
The twenty-first century has fundamentally altered the relationship between knowledge and wealth. For Nigeria, this transition from agriculture, natural resources or industrial production to the knowledge economy itself presents both an opportunity and an imperative. With one of the world’s youngest and most entrepreneurial populations, the country possesses enormous human potential. Yet that potential can only be realized if higher education moves beyond the traditional objective of producing graduates for existing jobs and embraces the broader mission of developing innovators, entrepreneurs and creators of new industries.
This demands a fundamental rethinking of entrepreneurship education. For too long, entrepreneurship has been treated as a compulsory course, often reduced to business-plan writing or elementary instruction in small-scale trading. While such initiatives have value, they fall far short of what the knowledge economy requires. True entrepreneurship education is not merely about starting businesses; it is about cultivating the capacity to identify opportunities, solve complex problems, develop innovative products, mobilize resources, manage risk and create sustainable value. It is a philosophy of initiative, resilience and productive enterprise that should permeate the entire educational experience.
Consequently, entrepreneurship should not be confined to business schools or entrepreneurship centers. Engineering students should be challenged to transform prototypes into commercially viable technologies. Agricultural graduates should develop innovative solutions across the agricultural value chain, from precision farming to agro-processing and agribusiness. Computer scientists should be encouraged to create digital platforms, software solutions and artificial intelligence applications that address local and global challenges. Graduates of the humanities and social sciences should be equipped to build enterprises in the creative industries, public policy, media, education, tourism and cultural innovation. Every discipline has the potential to generate enterprise when knowledge is deliberately connected with opportunity.
The implication is that every graduate of Nigerian higher education should leave not merely with a certificate but with a portfolio of competencies that enables meaningful participation in national development. Such a graduate should possess five indispensable attributes: 1) sound academic competence grounded in disciplinary knowledge; 2) practical and technical competence that enables effective application of knowledge; 3) entrepreneurial capability to identify opportunities and create value; 4) digital proficiency to thrive in a technology-driven world; and 5) ethical character and leadership capacity to deploy knowledge responsibly in the service of society. These competencies are no longer optional; together, they define the strategic human capital required by the knowledge economy.
Equally important is the transformation of the university itself. The contemporary university can no longer be understood simply as a teaching institution or a repository of scholarly knowledge. It must evolve into a dynamic ecosystem where education, research, innovation and enterprise reinforce one another. Around the world, leading universities have become engines of economic growth through research commercialization, technology transfer, start-up incubation and close collaboration with industry. Institutions such as Stanford University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the National University of Singapore and the Technical University of Munich have demonstrated that universities can simultaneously pursue academic excellence and contribute directly to technological advancement, industrial competitiveness and national prosperity (Etzkowitz, 2008; WIPO, 2024).
Nigeria’s universities and polytechnics must embrace this “third mission” with greater intentionality. Academic excellence should continue to be measured by rigorous scholarship and high-quality publications, but these should increasingly translate into patents, prototypes, technologies, start-ups and scalable solutions to societal challenges. Research should not terminate on library shelves or in journal databases; it should find expression in products, processes, public policy, improved livelihoods and new enterprises. Put differently, our institutions must move from publications to patents, from patents to products, and from products to prosperity.
Achieving this transformation requires stronger partnerships among universities, industry and government. Research priorities should be informed by national development needs, while industry should become an active partner in curriculum design, innovation funding, internship programmes and technology commercialization. Government, for its part, must create policy and funding frameworks that reward innovation, support university spin-off companies, strengthen intellectual property protection and facilitate investment in research-driven enterprises. The interaction among academia, industry and government—the “Triple Helix” model of innovation—has become a defining feature of the world’s most successful knowledge economies (Etzkowitz & Leydesdorff, 2000).
Ultimately, entrepreneurship and innovation are not peripheral concerns; they are central pillars of the Nigerian Project. A nation cannot sustainably create jobs by relying solely on government employment or foreign investment. It creates enduring prosperity by empowering its people to generate ideas, transform those ideas into enterprises, and build industries that expand opportunity for others. Higher education must therefore become the principal nursery of this creative and productive enterprise.
The future belongs not simply to societies that educate their citizens, but to those that empower them to innovate, create wealth and solve humanity’s most pressing problems. That is the true promise of entrepreneurship education, and that is the pathway by which higher education can become a decisive instrument of national renewal.
I do not think it will be out of place at this point to commend this University for providing leadership in the intentional embedding of entrepreneurship, innovation and practical learning within the national educational philosophy, seeking to produce graduates who can create value and employment rather than depend exclusively on salaried jobs. From Agriculture to Engineering and ICT, from Medicine to Business, from Law to the Sciences, and through its emphasis on research, multidisciplinary collaboration, international partnerships, exchange programmes and digital competence, ABUAD has demonstrated a deliberate commitment to bridging the traditional divide between the university and the productive economy. From my findings—and I assure you, I have done my research on this institution well—ABUAD has, over the years, established a tradition of excellence in consistently turning out graduates who are not merely employable, but are equipped to become innovators, entrepreneurs, researchers, professionals and creators of value. Its distinctive contribution to functional education lies in transforming the University from a place where knowledge is acquired into an ecosystem where knowledge is applied, innovation is nurtured and solutions are created for society.
On behalf of other Nigerians of similar persuasion as myself, I want to urge ABUAD not to rest on its already outstanding achievements in the reformulation of our tertiary education landscape. As a pathfinder, more is definitely expected in its course-charting programme in the national renewal project.
Character Formation and the Moral Foundations of Human Capital
As important as technical competence, innovation and entrepreneurship are to national development, they are not sufficient by themselves. The history of nations demonstrates that prosperity is sustained not merely by the accumulation of knowledge or technology but by the moral character with which they are applied. A society may produce brilliant engineers, gifted lawyers, accomplished physicians, outstanding entrepreneurs and world-class scientists; yet where integrity is absent, institutions become weak, corruption flourishes, public trust erodes and national progress is ultimately undermined. Human capital without moral capital cannot sustain national development.
This truth is increasingly recognized even within contemporary development discourse. Francis Fukuyama (1995) argues that societies characterized by high levels of trust possess stronger institutions, lower transaction costs and greater economic competitiveness. Similarly, Douglass North (1990) demonstrates that the quality of institutions—and the values that sustain them—largely determines long-term economic performance. Sustainable development therefore depends not only on what citizens know but also on who they are.
This understanding has profound implications for higher education. Universities and other tertiary institutions are not merely centers for transmitting knowledge; they are communities for forming character. Their responsibility extends beyond producing competent graduates to producing trustworthy citizens, ethical professionals and responsible leaders. Excellence without integrity is dangerous; intelligence without character is unstable; innovation without ethical restraint can become destructive rather than transformative.
Consequently, functional education in the twenty-first century must deliberately cultivate virtues that strengthen both individual character and national life. Among these are integrity, which inspires honesty and respect for ethical standards; discipline, which enables perseverance, excellence and responsible stewardship; patriotism, which places national interest above personal gain; servant leadership, which understands leadership as a responsibility rather than a privilege; accountability, which promotes transparency and public confidence; diligence, which values hard work over entitlement; and compassion and social responsibility, which remind graduates that education ultimately finds its highest purpose in service to humanity.
These virtues are not peripheral to economic development; they are foundational to it. Investors are attracted to societies where contracts are honoured, public institutions are trusted and ethical standards are respected. Scientific discoveries produce lasting benefits only when guided by responsibility. Entrepreneurship flourishes most effectively in environments characterized by honesty, fairness and accountability. In this sense, moral capital is itself a productive asset, sustaining the institutional trust upon which innovation, commerce and democratic governance depend.
Faith-based universities occupy a particularly significant place within this national assignment. Their distinctive contribution to higher education lies not only in academic excellence but also in the deliberate integration of intellectual development with moral and spiritual formation. By nurturing ethical consciousness, respect for human dignity, selfless service and reverence for truth, such institutions help produce graduates whose professional competence is anchored in enduring values. Their mission reminds us that the ultimate measure of education is not merely what graduates are able to achieve, but the manner in which they employ their knowledge and influence. This however, is not the exclusive responsibility of faith-based universities.
Indeed, Afe Babalola University has consistently embraced this philosophy. Its emphasis on discipline, integrity, entrepreneurship, excellence and character formation reflects an understanding that education is complete only when it develops the whole person—mind, skill and character. This holistic vision resonates with the enduring African conception of education, in which learning is expected to produce not only capable individuals but also responsible members of the community. It equally echoes the timeless observation of the Rev, Martin Luther King Jr. that “intelligence plus character—that is the goal of true education.”
As Nigeria seeks national renewal, this moral dimension of education becomes even more imperative. Our country does not suffer from a shortage of educated people; it suffers, too often, from a deficit of ethical leadership and institutional integrity. The challenge before higher education is therefore not simply to produce more graduates, but to produce graduates whose knowledge is governed by wisdom, whose competence is guided by conscience, and whose success is measured not only by personal achievement but also by their contribution to the common good.
Ultimately, the strategic human capital required for the Nigerian Project must be defined by more than technical expertise or entrepreneurial ability. It must also be distinguished by integrity, responsibility, compassion and an unwavering commitment to justice and service. For it is only when intellectual excellence is joined with moral character that education becomes truly functional, leadership becomes genuinely transformative, and national development becomes both sustainable and enduring.
A Strategic Agenda for National Renewal
Having reflected on the historical evolution of Nigerian higher education, the demands of the knowledge economy, the strategic importance of Technical and Vocational Education and Training, the imperative of entrepreneurship and innovation, and the indispensable role of character formation, we are now in a position to answer the practical question: What must Nigeria do?
If higher education is to become the principal driver of national renewal, incremental adjustments will no longer suffice. What is required is a comprehensive and coordinated reform agenda that deliberately aligns education with the developmental aspirations of the Nigerian state. Such an agenda must be anchored on the conviction that education is not merely a social service; it is the nation’s most strategic investment in its future.
1) The first priority must be a decisive shift from content-driven education to competency-based and outcome-oriented learning. For too long, educational quality has been measured largely by the volume of knowledge transmitted and the number of certificates awarded. The twenty-first century demands a different paradigm. Success should increasingly be evaluated by what graduates are able to know, do and become. Curricula should therefore be designed around demonstrable competencies, practical problem-solving, critical thinking, collaboration, creativity and lifelong learning, ensuring that graduates possess the capabilities required by a rapidly changing world.
2) Second, Nigeria must undertake the systematic revitalization of Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) and restore the strategic relevance of polytechnic education. Industrialization, technological innovation and economic diversification require a steady pipeline of competent technologists, technicians, engineering practitioners and skilled professionals. Public investment in workshops, fabrication laboratories, engineering facilities, digital manufacturing technologies and modern equipment should therefore be regarded not as expenditure but as long-term investment in national productivity and industrial competitiveness.
3) Third, entrepreneurship, artificial intelligence and digital literacy must become foundational competencies across all disciplines rather than specialized subjects confined to particular faculties. Whether studying engineering, medicine, agriculture, law, education, business or the humanities, every student should graduate with the capacity to apply digital technologies, identify opportunities, innovate responsibly and adapt continuously to technological change. In academic parlance, this is broadly referred to as interdisciplinarity. In today’s world, digital competence is no longer an advantage; it is an essential requirement for productive citizenship.
4) Fourth, Nigeria must strengthen collaboration among universities, industry and government. No educational institution can remain relevant if it operates in isolation from the economy it is expected to serve. Employers should participate actively in curriculum design, industrial training, research partnerships and graduate development, while government should provide policy frameworks and incentives that encourage collaborative innovation. Such partnerships ensure that educational programmes remain responsive to national priorities and emerging labour-market realities.
5) Equally important is the deliberate promotion of research commercialization and indigenous technology development. Our universities and polytechnics must increasingly become centers where ideas are transformed into products, patents evolve into enterprises, and scientific discoveries contribute directly to economic growth. Nigeria cannot sustainably build a competitive economy by depending predominantly on imported technologies. Our institutions must therefore cultivate stronger cultures of innovation, intellectual property development, technology transfer and enterprise incubation, ensuring that research addresses local challenges while creating globally competitive solutions.
6) Furthermore, experiential learning must become an indispensable feature of higher education. The Students Industrial Work Experience Scheme (SIWES), structured apprenticeships, internships, cooperative education and community-based projects should no longer be viewed as peripheral requirements but as integral components of every academic programme. Students learn most effectively when theory is reinforced through practical engagement, industry exposure and real-world problem-solving. Graduates who have experienced meaningful workplace learning are better equipped to contribute productively from the very beginning of their professional careers.
Permit me to illustrate this proposition with a development particularly close to my heart: the landmark partnership between United Nigeria Airlines and Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti. Under the MoU, approximately twenty 400-level Aeronautical and Aerospace Engineering students will undertake structured industrial training with the airline annually under a renewable ten-year framework. The significance of the partnership lies not in the signing ceremony, but in what it enables students to experience. The pioneer cohort has commenced a six-month hands-on programme at the airline’s engineering facility in Lagos, gaining exposure to aircraft maintenance, avionics, safety procedures and professional aviation practice. They are therefore not merely learning about aviation; they are beginning to experience it.
7) In addition, sustained investment is required in innovation hubs, engineering workshops, fabrication centres, technology incubation parks, digital laboratories and interdisciplinary research facilities. These are no longer optional amenities; they constitute the infrastructure of the knowledge economy. They provide the environment in which creativity is nurtured, prototypes are developed, technologies are refined and entrepreneurial ideas are transformed into commercially viable enterprises. Institutions that aspire to shape the future must also possess the physical and technological capacity to invent it.
Finally, Nigeria must rethink the criteria by which institutional success is measured. Universities and polytechnics should not be evaluated solely on enrolment figures, graduation rates or the number of accredited programmes. Important as these indicators remain, they tell only part of the story. In the twenty-first century, institutional excellence should also be assessed by the quality of graduates produced, their employability and adaptability, the number of successful enterprises created by alumni, the commercial and societal impact of research, the generation of patents and innovative technologies, the strength of industry partnerships, and the institution’s measurable contribution to national development. These indicators more accurately reflect whether higher education is fulfilling its strategic mission.
None of these reforms can succeed in isolation. Curriculum innovation without competent lecturers will have limited impact. Modern laboratories without industry collaboration will remain underutilized. Entrepreneurship education without access to finance, mentorship and innovation ecosystems will produce aspiration rather than enterprise. Likewise, technical competence without ethical leadership cannot build enduring institutions. The strength of this agenda lies precisely in its integration. Each component reinforces the others, creating an educational ecosystem capable of producing graduates who are intellectually grounded, technically proficient, digitally agile, entrepreneurially minded and ethically responsible.
The future of Nigeria will ultimately be determined not by the abundance of its natural resources, but by the quality of its people and the institutions that prepare them. Repositioning higher education is therefore not simply an educational necessity; it is a national imperative. If we summon the vision, courage and commitment to pursue this strategic agenda with consistency and purpose, our universities, polytechnics and colleges of education will become more than centres of learning—they will become the principal architects of Nigeria’s economic transformation, technological advancement and enduring national renewal.
Conclusion: Functional Education and the Future of the Nigerian Project
The enduring lesson of history is therefore unmistakable: functional education is not a new educational philosophy; it is the timeless obligation of every generation to align education with the changing needs and highest aspirations of society. The question before us is not whether education should be functional. It always has been. The real question is whether we possess the vision, courage and collective resolve to make it functional for the Nigeria of the twenty-first century.
I am persuaded that we do.
And if we commit ourselves to that purpose with wisdom, consistency and determination, then future generations will look back on our time and say that this was the generation that repositioned Nigerian higher education, rebuilt the nation’s productive capacity, developed its strategic human capital and, in so doing, gave fresh meaning and enduring hope to the Nigerian Project. That is why I see ABUAD as not just a Nigerian university, but The University.
If functional education is to become a defining feature of twenty-first-century Nigeria, Government and regulatory agencies must create the conditions, incentives and standards that enable institutions to move beyond certificate-centered education towards capability-centered education. Education should be treated as productive national infrastructure, with investment directed not only towards classrooms and curricula but also towards laboratories, workshops, research, digital infrastructure, technical personnel, innovation and industry partnerships. The NUC should progressively shift its emphasis from minimum standards of curriculum content to minimum standards of graduate capability, asking not only what students have studied but what they can actually design, build, create, research, produce, manage and solve. The NBTE’s competency-based approach through the National Skills Qualifications Framework offers a useful model for recognizing practical competence acquired in classrooms, workplaces and other learning environments.
The rigid divide between academic and vocational education should therefore give way to an integrated system in which universities become more practical and technical education becomes more knowledge-intensive, with industry playing a permanent role in curriculum development, internships, apprenticeships, research and innovation. Accreditation should likewise become increasingly outcome-oriented, examining graduate employability, entrepreneurship, professional competence, research, innovation and societal impact alongside traditional institutional inputs. Government must also anticipate emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, robotics, biotechnology, cybersecurity, renewable energy and advanced manufacturing, while restoring dignity and national recognition to technical and vocational skills. Ultimately, the purpose of regulation should not merely be to ensure institutional compliance, but to help define the capabilities Nigeria will need, establish credible pathways for acquiring and demonstrating those capabilities, and ensure that education remains connected to the productive life of the nation. The guiding principle should be simple: education must produce capability, because the ultimate measure of an educational system is not the certificates it awards, but the capacity it creates in its people to build, solve, innovate and transform society.
And now, to you, the graduating class: do not mistake your certificate for the education itself; let the true evidence of your education be found in what you do with the knowledge and opportunities you have received. Go into the world not merely as degree holders seeking employment, but as problem-solvers, creators, innovators, professionals, entrepreneurs and value-makers, asking not only, “Where can I find a job?” but, more importantly, “What problem can I solve?” Pursue mastery in whatever path you choose, whether employment, entrepreneurship, research, public service or professional practice, and remember that in a rapidly changing world, your graduation marks not the end of learning but the beginning of lifelong quest for knowledge. Become internationally competent, embrace technology and global standards, but remain connected to Nigeria and committed to bringing knowledge, ideas, investment and solutions to the advancement of your society. Start small if necessary, respect the dignity of work, guard your integrity, and remember that competence without character is ultimately dangerous. Above all, become responsible citizens who contribute rather than merely complain, and measure your success not only by wealth or position but by the lives you improve, the problems you solve, the institutions you strengthen and the value you leave behind. Do not ask what the world owes you because you have graduated; ask what the world needs from you because you have been educated. Let your education become action, your knowledge become competence, your competence become value, your value become service, and your service become a contribution to the transformation of your society.
And for the rest of us, if we commit ourselves to that purpose with wisdom, consistency and determination, then future generations will look back on our time and say that this was the generation that repositioned Nigerian higher education, rebuilt the nation’s productive capacity, developed its strategic human capital and, in so doing, gave fresh meaning and enduring hope to the Nigerian Project. That quality of education in ABUAD is definitely all of the above and more.
• Prof Okonkwo, Executive Chairman of United Nigeria Airlines (UNA), delivered this lecture at the 14th Convocation Lecture of Afe Babalola University Ado-Ekiti (ABUAD).
The post Functional education and Nigerian project: Strategic human capital development for national renewal appeared first on The Sun Nigeria.