The information ministry on Saturday rebutted the Afghan Taliban’s stance that it lacked the “capabilities” to fuel insecurity in other countries and criticised it for resorting to “diversionary allegations” instead of preventing the use of Afghanistan’s soil for terrorist attacks against Pakistan.
The ministry’s rebuttal comes after spokesperson for the interim Taliban administration in Afghanistan, Zabiullah Mujahid, said in a statement on X last night that it was not in his country’s “interest to create insecurity in Pakistan or to support any acts of instability there”.
He further contended that the Taliban “do not possess capabilities or resources to foment or finance insecurity in other countries”, and claimed that Islamabad’s “misguided approach distracted Pakistan’s security forces from their own duties”.
On Saturday, the information ministry stated, “Pakistan’s concerns are not based on conjecture.”
It backed its stance on cross-border terrorism from Afghanistan by citing a report by the United Nations Security Council’s (UNSC) Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team and another report submitted to the United States Congress.
The UNSC team, in its 16th report, “examined the presence and activities of terrorist groups in Afghanistan”, the ministry said.
It further noted that the report by the US Lead Inspector General’s Operation Enduring Sentinel for January-March 2026 stated that the Afghan Taliban continued to allow the banned Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) to operate from Afghan territory.
The ministry also highlighted other findings from the report, which stated that the Taliban continued to allow TTP “greater liberty and support, resulting in increased TTP attacks against Pakistan”.
It added that TTP remained the “largest in number” among those groups. “The report estimated TTP strength at 4,000-6,000 fighters. These assessments underscore the seriousness of Pakistan’s concerns regarding terrorist sanctuaries and support networks operating from Afghan soil,” the information ministry emphasised.
Earlier in the day, the information ministry rejected former United States envoy Zalmay Khalilzad’s “baseless and misleading allegations” that Pakistan was “arming Afghans to fight the Taliban”.
The ministry’s response came a day after Khalilzad, who served as special representative to Afghanistan during the first Trump administration, claimed on X that there were ” many reports that Pakistan is arming Afghans to fight the Taliban in Afghanistan”. He further alleged that Pakistan was now “recruiting Afghans to fight against anti-Pakistan insurgents”, adding that ties between the two countries were likely to “get much worse”.
“His sweeping baseless assertions merely recycle speculative narratives as part of his personal agenda to prop [the] terrorism-supporting Taliban regime,” the information ministry’s fact-check account said on X.
It rebuked Khalilzad, saying his “[peddling] of such unsubstantiated allegations only exposes his skewed agenda-based views”.
The ministry highlighted that it was “particularly misleading to conflate Pakistan’s legitimate counterterrorism operations against terrorist organisations operating from inside Afghan Taliban regime-controlled areas threatening its citizens with allegations of recruiting Afghan nationals or sponsoring armed groups inside Afghanistan”.
“Pakistan remains at the forefront of the fight against terrorism and has made enormous sacrifices in protecting regional peace and security,” it emphasised.
It went on to point out that successive monitoring reports issued by the United Nations had documented the continued presence and activities of terrorist organisations, including the banned Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and Al-Qaeda, inside Afghanistan.
“Khalilzad’s allegations conveniently divert attention from the Afghan Taliban regime’s responsibility to prevent its territory from being used by India-sponsored proxies for terrorism against Pakistan,” the statement added.
Khalilzad, who negotiated a US deal with the Taliban that led to the withdrawal of Nato forces from Afghanistan, has previously called for Islamabad and Kabul to enter a negotiated settlement multiple times, as recently as January this year.