'Moms' By Shivani Sibal: Behind The Perfect Family

What does it mean to be a good mother when the world has already decided what a good woman looks like? In Moms, Shivani Sibal takes us into the manicured world of Delhi’s privileged legal elite, where designer wardrobes, sprawling homes, school WhatsApp groups and carefully curated family photographs conceal the less photogenic realities of marriage and motherhood. It is a world where reputation is currency, appearances are a form of survival, and women are expected to keep their unhappiness as impeccably managed as their households.

At the centre of the novel is Radhika Khanna, a woman whose life appears enviable from the outside. Married into a wealthy family with deep connections in the legal fraternity, she has the house, the husband, the daughter and the social standing that many are taught to aspire to. Yet, beneath this carefully constructed picture of domestic success lies a woman struggling with the consequences of a life she was never quite encouraged to choose for herself. Having married young, Radhika gives up the possibility of pursuing her own ambitions and gradually finds herself defined by her roles as a wife, a mother and a daughter-in-law. Her husband, Manik, is charming, successful and well connected, but the power he wields within their marriage is far removed from the romantic ideal Radhika once believed in.

Sibal’s sharpest observations emerge from the contradictions of motherhood itself. Radhika loves the idea of being a mother long before she understands what motherhood will demand of her. The arrival of her daughter, Samara, does not automatically transform her into the endlessly patient, selfless woman that society expects. Instead, Radhika finds herself overwhelmed by the physical exhaustion, emotional isolation and relentless expectations of raising a child. She is not always affectionate; she resents the loss of her former life, and she struggles to reconcile the mother she thinks she should be with the woman she actually is. Her discomfort is particularly striking because she has access to resources that most mothers can only dream of: nannies, domestic help, money and the freedom to outsource much of the practical labour of childcare. And yet, material comfort offers little protection from emotional distress.

This is where Moms becomes especially interesting. Sibal refuses to present motherhood as an uncomplicated source of fulfilment, but she is equally unwilling to romanticise the women who inhabit its world. Radhika and the mothers around her can be judgemental, vain, competitive and casually cruel. They scrutinise one another’s parenting, bodies, marriages and social standing, while participating in the same systems that constrain them. Their friendships offer companionship, but they are also governed by hierarchies of wealth, desirability and belonging. The school mothers’ groups, social gatherings and neighbourhood rituals become miniature theatres of status, where everyone is watching everyone else and nobody is entirely free to admit that their life might be falling apart.

The novel’s setting is central to this critique. Sibal understands the particular absurdities of elite Delhi society, from the elaborate choreography of social occasions to the unspoken calculations behind marriages, professional success and family alliances. Her attention to luxury brands, expensive holidays, domestic staff and the rituals of the affluent gives the novel a deliciously satirical edge. The humour often comes from the sheer ridiculousness of people who have every conceivable material advantage yet remain consumed by insecurity, entitlement and the fear of losing their place in the social order. But the satire also reveals something darker: privilege can make suffering harder to recognise, both for those experiencing it and for those looking in from the outside. When a life appears perfect, unhappiness is easily dismissed as ingratitude.

Manik embodies another of the novel’s central concerns: the relationship between power and respectability. His professional standing, inherited networks and public charm protect him in ways that Radhika’s private suffering cannot compete with. Their marriage exposes how easily conventional markers of success can disguise coercion and abuse, particularly when the people involved belong to influential families. The legal world surrounding them adds another layer of irony. Here are people whose professional lives revolve around evidence, arguments and accountability, yet whose personal relationships are shaped by silence, denial and the management of appearances. The question is not simply whether the truth will emerge, but whether the truth can survive the interests of those determined to suppress it.

Sibal also complicates the story by looking beyond Radhika’s marriage to the childhood experiences that shape her understanding of love, discipline and family. The past is not merely explanatory backstory; it becomes part of a larger examination of how emotional wounds travel across generations. The women in the novel are neither entirely victims nor entirely villains. They are people who have inherited particular ideas about femininity and family, sometimes perpetuating the very cruelties they have suffered. This does not absolve them of responsibility, but it makes their behaviour more difficult to reduce to a simple morality tale.

The novel’s structure reinforces its central concerns. Beginning with Radhika’s death before returning to the years that preceded it, Moms asks readers to look beyond the apparent finality of a tragedy and examine the ordinary circumstances that accumulate around it. The second half shifts towards the aftermath, revealing how grief can become entangled with reputation, convenience and the desire to preserve a family’s standing. Even death does not necessarily interrupt the machinery of social respectability. The living continue to negotiate, rationalise and move on, while the person who is gone risks being reduced to a version of herself that is easier for everyone else to accept.

There are moments when the novel’s abundance of social detail and its broad cast of characters threaten to overwhelm its emotional centre. Its satire can be so eager to expose the absurdities of the privileged that the characters occasionally feel like representatives of a social type rather than fully realised individuals. Some of its observations are also deliberately blunt, leaving little room for ambiguity. But these excesses are offset by Sibal’s willingness to enter uncomfortable territory. She does not ask readers to like Radhika at every turn, nor does she suggest that access to money and domestic help makes her struggles less real. Instead, she asks us to consider the distance between a woman’s public identity and her private experience, and what happens when that distance becomes impossible to bridge.

Ultimately, Moms is less a novel about the mechanics of motherhood than about the performance of being a woman who has supposedly got everything right. It examines the cost of building a life around other people’s expectations, the social rewards attached to keeping up appearances, and the devastating consequences of treating a polished exterior as proof that everything beneath it must be fine. Its most unsettling insight is that a family can look entirely successful from the outside while remaining deeply unhappy within.

In Sibal’s world, the perfect home is not necessarily a happy one, the perfect husband is not necessarily a good one, and the perfect mother is often an impossible fiction. Moms asks what happens when women are expected to maintain that fiction at any cost, and how much of their lives can disappear behind the performance before anyone thinks to look closer.

Also, Read:

ELLE Exclusive: Elif Shafak’s New Book Turns The Gaze Back On The Man Behind Emma Bovary

In Conversation With Shefali Shah On Her Debut Book ‘The Audacity of Being’ and Political Correctness