AS world leaders prepare to gather in Shenzhen for next month's Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (Apec) summit, speculation is mounting over a possible meeting between Donald Trump and Kim Jong-un — a prospect experts say remains remote.
In 2019, North Korea's Kim made the 60-hour train journey home from Hanoi empty-handed after his summit with the US president collapsed.
Now, the dynamic has reversed: Trump is making repeated overtures, only to be met with silence from Pyongyang.
Trump said again last week that he "may" meet with Kim during his Asian tour next month and that it "would be exciting".
But on Monday, he said: "I don't know... I'm not sure that anybody's asking for a meeting," adding that his "relationship with Kim Jong-un is very good".
Any meeting between the leaders would trigger a media frenzy, but Pyongyang's deepening ties with Russia and China could complicate Trump's bid for a potential announcement of talks ahead of the midterms.
Analysts say Trump is seeking
a foreign policy win as the Iran war drags on. Kim, by contrast, may have less to gain from another high-profile encounter with Trump, they say.
Kim's decision to send troops and weapons to aid Moscow's
war in Ukraine has won critical backing from Russian President Vladimir Putin, helping North Korea blunt United Nations sanctions over its nuclear programme.
North Korea's economy, in fact, grew more than three per cent for a third straight year in 2025, South Korea's central bank estimated
in July, citing Pyongyang's "expansion of economic cooperation with Russia" as its major driver.
China remains North Korea's key ally — a major source of diplomatic and economic support for the country.
"I see almost no possibility of a meeting," said Lim Eul-chul, a professor at the Institute for Far Eastern Studies at Kyungnam University.
"For Kim Jong-un, maintaining the status quo is the best option right now."
Trump met Kim three times during his first term — once declaring they were "in love" — in high-profile summits aimed at securing a denuclearisation deal, but no tangible progress was made. Since then, North Korea has continued to expand and develop its arsenal.
South Korea's dovish President Lee Jae-myung suggested in September that Washington seek a freeze of its nuclear programme in return for sanctions relief.
Critics say such an approach risks tacitly accepting North Korea as a nuclear-armed state while allowing Pyongyang to win sanctions relief without giving up its arsenal. Analysts say China appeared to move towards implicit acceptance.
Kim hosted Chinese President Xi Jinping in Pyongyang in June, soon after Xi held back-to-back summits in Beijing with Trump and Putin.
Neither Pyongyang nor Beijing mentioned North Korean denuclearisation in their official statements — an omission experts saw as a sign of China's tacit consent.
The dividing of the "United States and Japan on one side and North Korea, China and Russia on the other... into blocs, is creating significant opportunities for North Korea," said Hong Min, a senior researcher at the Korea Institute for National Unification.
Kim's powerful sister, Kim Yo-jong, said in September the country's nuclear-armed status was "absolute" and called those hoping for its denuclearisation "idiots".
The more consequential question is "whether Washington would begin negotiating on the operational assumption that North Korea's arsenal is not going to disappear", said Vladimir Tikhonov, Korean Studies professor at the University of Oslo.
"I see that a possibility of such a policy shift is substantial."
Meanwhile, China's influence rests partly on its role as an intermediary between Pyongyang and Washington, and a direct Trump-Kim deal that sidelines Beijing in Shenzhen could therefore erode its leverage over both sides.
"A dialogue may be pursued with the understanding of Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping," said Yang Moo-jin, former president of the University of North Korean Studies.
But with Russia delivering immediate benefits, analysts said that time and strategic momentum are on Kim's side.
"Giving up all these benefits, withdrawing from the Russia-Ukraine war and entering uncertain dialogue with the United States is difficult to imagine right now," Yang said.
The writer is from AFP
© New Straits Times Press (M) Bhd