By PYMNTS | October 22, 2026
Highlights
Falling crypto prices reduce the collateral backing trading loans.
Leveraged trading losses leave the borrower’s repayment obligation intact.
Liquidation provisions limit an owner’s ability to wait for recovery.
Bitcoin holders borrowing to finance leveraged trading retain their original investment and take on another source of exposure. Their coins continue to fluctuate, the financed position produces its own gains or losses, and the dollar loan remains payable regardless of either result.
The attraction is access to trading funds without selling cryptocurrency upfront. There’s risk involved, too, tied to a volatile asset supporting debt while using the proceeds for a position that already involves leverage.
A new financing arrangement lets eligible Kalshi Prime brokerage customers borrow dollars from affiliate Kalshi Katalyst against bitcoin, ether or eligible stablecoins held with BitGo Bank & Trust, PYMNTS reported Wednesday (Oct. 21), citing Bloomberg. Proceeds fund perpetual futures margin and other eligible margin products. Customers retain ownership of their pledged cryptocurrency, subject to the lender’s security interest, according to a Thursday (Oct. 22) press release.
Borrowing Against a Moving Asset
Perpetual futures provide exposure to asset prices without a conventional expiration date. The financing concerns futures trading, rather than establishing bitcoin-backed loans for ordinary sports or election wagers.
For borrowers, the collateral and the financed trade require separate accounting. A profitable futures position doesn’t necessarily offset a decline in pledged cryptocurrency. Conversely, rising collateral values don’t eliminate losses on the trade or the cost of borrowing.
The relationship between the positions also affects exposure. Borrowing against bitcoin to take additional exposure to rising crypto prices concentrates the borrower’s dependence on the same market. A short position produces a different relationship, with the overall result dependent on its size, timing and financing costs.
We’d love to be your preferred source for news.
Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!
Volatility Becomes a Credit Exposure
The PYMNTS Intelligence report “From Asset to Everyday Money: Making Digital Currencies Spendable,” the July edition of the Payments Innovation Tracker® Series, examined the difficulty of putting digital holdings to use while their value fluctuates. Binance research cited in the report found that 43% of respondents identified price volatility as a barrier to spending cryptocurrency.
Crypto-backed financing carries that uncertainty into a credit relationship. When bitcoin falls, the collateral supporting a dollar loan loses value without reducing the principal owed.
Against that scenario, an investor holding unencumbered bitcoin chooses whether to sell during a decline. A borrower has already granted a lender rights over pledged coins. Holding through a downturn requires continued compliance with the financing agreement.
Regulatory coverage also differs across the arrangement. Kalshi Prime is a CFTC-registered futures commission merchant, while neither the lending affiliate nor its loans are regulated by the CFTC or National Futures Association, the press release said.
Crypto collateral also supports institutional event trading. BitGo’s March offering with Susquehanna Crypto accepts bitcoin, stablecoins, dollars or other crypto for event-linked derivatives, with a $100,000 minimum trade size, according to a March 25 press release.
The broader trend from the announcements is one of movement beyond owning crypto to borrowing against it, giving holders access to cash while preserving their investment. Price swings then reach beyond portfolio returns into the amount of credit those holdings support.
For lenders and trading platforms, expansion creates a shared dependence on collateral that changes value around the clock. During a selloff, decisions about lending limits and asset sales affect customers who intended to remain invested. The growth of this financing ties crypto ownership more closely to credit markets, where an investor’s willingness to absorb losses doesn’t necessarily match a lender’s willingness to keep financing them.