Bench says it will first examine their responses, while the Bar Association argues the statements could erode public confidence in the apex judiciary
PTI Published 16.10.26, 02:12 PM
Sanjay Raut File photo
Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) leader Sanjay Raut and journalist Nikhil Wagle have been asked to explain their public remarks about Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and the judiciary, with the Supreme Court issuing show-cause notices to both in criminal contempt proceedings on Friday.
A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi exempted the two from appearing in person at the next hearing, saying it would first examine their responses to the notices.
The proceedings stem from a petition filed by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA). Its president, senior advocate Pradeep Rai, argued that the remarks crossed the limits of fair criticism and could erode public confidence in the country's highest court.
The bench expressed concern over statements directed at the judiciary. The Chief Justice of India observed that courts had consistently upheld personal liberty and fundamental rights, making attacks on the institution particularly unfortunate.
The SCBA sought the personal appearance of Raut and Wagle, but the bench decided to issue notices seeking their explanations before considering further steps.
"We are giving a show-cause as of now. Of course we are granting exemption for personal appearance. Let us see," the bench said.
The proceedings follow consent granted by Attorney General R Venkataramani on October 15 to initiate criminal contempt action under Section 15(1)(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The SCBA had filed its petition on the same day.
The controversy arose after the Chief Justice of India declined a request for a personal meeting with a delegation of Opposition parties, indicating that their concerns could instead be raised through a petition before the court.
According to the SCBA's petition, Wagle subsequently posted a remark on his X account that the association described as abusive and directed at the Chief Justice. The petition stated that Wagle later withdrew the remark.
Raut also made remarks that the association considered objectionable, prompting the SCBA to seek criminal contempt proceedings against both men.
The court's decision to seek explanations marks the initial stage of the proceedings. The notices require the respondents to explain why action should not be taken against them for criminal contempt.
Get accurate news by selecting Telegraph India on Google
