Trump Frames Potential Putin-Xi Meeting Around Denuclearization — Leaving Ukraine With No Seat at the Table

---

Trump Agrees in Principle — on His Own Terms

President Donald Trump told reporters outside the White House on Monday that he would be willing to sit down with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping, but made clear from the outset that any such meeting would not be a Ukraine peace summit. "I would do it, not so much for Ukraine," Trump told reporters, adding that the gathering would instead be "based on denuclearization." He also left the door open for trade to come up, but reiterated that nuclear arms reduction would be the primary focus.

The October 9 Call That Started It All

The proposal traces back to a phone call between Putin and Trump on October 9, during which the Russian president raised the idea of a three-way meeting alongside the upcoming Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation leaders' summit. The Wall Street Journal first reported the proposal, citing a former Russian intelligence officer briefed on the discussions — the same conversation that also produced an agreement for the United States to facilitate the sale of Russian diesel on global markets. The Kremlin had, in fact, been floating the trilateral concept since at least July, and Putin raised it in more than one call with Trump before the October 9 exchange, according to Axios. If the summit materializes, it would take place on the sidelines of the APEC gathering scheduled for November 18–19 in the Chinese city of Shenzhen — though no formal agreement has been reached.

Kremlin Confirms Discussions, But Stops Short of a Commitment

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters that discussions had taken place around the possibility of a three-way meeting on the sidelines of the China summit. "Given that all three heads of state might potentially attend a summit in China, the topic of such a hypothetical meeting has indeed been mentioned," Peskov said, while carefully avoiding any confirmation of a firm arrangement. A separate statement Peskov gave to the Wall Street Journal went further in underscoring the uncertainty: he said there was "no clear understanding yet regarding the meeting itself or its potential agenda," even as he acknowledged that all three parties had discussed the possibility.

Beijing Stays Silent; Washington Hedges

China's foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning told reporters she had no information on a possible gathering, leaving Beijing's position publicly undeclared as of Tuesday, as Euronews reported. Xi Jinping has not indicated whether he would participate in what would be an exceptionally rare three-way summit of the world's largest nuclear powers. On the American side, Secretary of State Marco Rubio offered similarly cautious language, telling reporters Monday that discussions about a potential meeting were under way but declining to confirm whether Trump had formally agreed or whether a date had been set, per Reuters.

Ukraine and Its Allies Push Back Hard

The prospect of the three nuclear powers gathering to discuss a conflict in which Ukraine holds no chair triggered immediate and pointed condemnation from Kyiv. Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha posted his objection directly on X, arguing that the proposed format would produce the opposite of peace: "A trilateral meeting between the leaders of Russia, China, and the US would do only the opposite: encourage Putin to continue this war." European governments have also voiced concern, with several capitals pointing out that allowing Moscow to negotiate the terms of a conflict over Ukrainian territory — without Ukraine present — sets a damaging precedent for international law and sovereignty.

The Diesel Deal and the Sanctions Shift

The proposed summit did not arrive in a vacuum. It follows a rapid warming in Trump-Putin relations that has alarmed Kyiv and its European backers. That same October 9 phone call produced an agreement for Washington to facilitate Russian diesel sales on global markets, and the U.S. Treasury subsequently lifted sanctions on Russian diesel exports through April 2027. Zelensky publicly challenged both moves, arguing they would not bring down pump prices for American consumers and amounted to a concession to Moscow at a particularly sensitive moment heading into the 2026 midterm elections. Trump has framed Russia as a cooperative partner throughout this period and repeatedly positioned Zelensky as an obstacle to ending the conflict.

Intelligence Sharing Threats Deepen the Crisis

The Washington-Kyiv rift runs deeper than diplomatic optics. The Trump administration warned Ukrainian forces that intelligence-sharing could be suspended if they continued launching long-range drone strikes against oil refineries inside Russia, Zelensky disclosed in an interview with NPR. The Ukrainian president specified that the warning was conveyed not to him directly but to his military commanders. The crisis reached a dangerous flash point in mid-October when Zelensky reported that five Russian ballistic missiles struck civilian infrastructure in Kyiv with no advance warning from allied partners — the kind of early alert that the Ukrainian military relies on to trigger air raid systems in time. Kyiv's Air Force confirmed it had received no launch data from partner nations for the strike. Trump rejected the underlying charge, telling reporters: "We are helping them, and we are sharing intel."

Trump Turns Up the Heat on Zelensky

Rather than working to mend the relationship with Kyiv, Trump has repeatedly sharpened his public criticism of Zelensky. Since October 10, Trump has called on Ukraine to find new leadership capable of closing a deal with Russia, saying the current president has passed up multiple opportunities to negotiate. On Monday, alongside his comments about the potential trilateral summit, Trump again framed Zelensky as unwilling to reach an agreement — language that European allies warn effectively signals Washington's alignment with Moscow's long-standing demand for a change in Ukrainian leadership. The posture has alarmed Western governments, who have spent four years recognizing Zelensky as Ukraine's legitimate wartime leader and the only credible counterpart for any settlement.

An Unprecedented Gathering With Uncertain Odds

A summit between the sitting leaders of the United States, China, and Russia would be without precedent in modern diplomacy. Trump has, since taking office, sought to broker nuclear-reduction talks with both Moscow and Beijing, though neither Putin nor Xi have shown meaningful enthusiasm for that agenda. The proposal now sits in diplomatic limbo: Beijing has not confirmed, Moscow is hedging, and Washington's stated condition — that the meeting pivot away from Ukraine and toward denuclearization — has not been accepted by any party. What is undeniable is that the future of a country actively at war is increasingly being debated in rooms where that country is not invited, and Ukraine's capacity to influence that conversation is shrinking by the week.