Hanan Abdul-Wahab
The Office of the Attorney General (AG) has filed an appeal at the Supreme Court (SC) challenging the decision of the Court of Appeal to temporarily halt the trial of former Chief Executive Officer of National Food Buffer Stock Company Limited (NAFCO), Hanan Abdul-Wahab Aludiba, and his wife, Faiza Seidu Wuni, pending the determination of an appeal against the trial court refusing to strike out the charges.
The Notice of Appeal signed by Deputy Attorney General, Dr. Justice Srem-Sai, says the Office is challenging the entire decision of the Court of Appeal delivered on October 19, 2026.
It is asking the apex court to overturn the decision of the Court of Appeal and order the trial court to proceed with the trial.
“Take notice that the Prosecution/Respondent/Respondent/Appellat, being dissatisfied with a ruling of the Court of Appeal (Coram: J. Noble- Nkrumah, l. O. Marfo, and G. Buadi, JJ.A.), Accra, dated October 19, 2026, granting an interlocutory application for stay of proceedings pending appeal, hereby appeals to the Supreme Court on the grounds set out below and for the reliefs stated hereunder,” the notice partly read.
The Notice of Appeal contends that the Court of Appeal erred in holding that the mere challenge against a charge sheet constitutes an exceptional ground upon which to stay proceedings in a criminal trial.
It also contends that the ruling of the Court of Appeal cannot be supported having regard to the record.
The AG further pointed out that additional grounds for appeal may be filed upon receipt of the certified ruling of the Court of Appeal.
Trial
Mr. Aludiba is standing trial with his wife, Faiza Seidu Wuni, for allegedly stealing and causing financial loss to the state totalling GH¢62.6 million.
The Court of Appeal, on October 19, temporarily halted the trial of the couple pending the determination of an interlocutory appeal against the charges that initiated the trial.
This was after a three-member panel of the court granted an application for stay of proceedings filed by Godfred Yeboah Dame, lead counsel for Mr. Aludiba, challenging the decision of the High Court to dismiss a challenge against the charges.
Mr. Dame had challenged the charges filed by the Office of the Attorney General, contending that they are vague, ambiguous, duplicitous and renders a fair trial impossible, as well as violate his fundamental human rights as an accused person under the constitution.
The court, on July 23, dismissed Mr. Aludiba’s request to strike out the charge sheet for being “fatally defective.”
According to the court, apart from count 9 and 14 which it has directed the prosecution to amend, all the other 18 counts on the charge sheet provide enough details to inform the accused of the charges levelled against them.
On the issue of the prosecution charging the accused with the offence of stealing and defrauding by false pretences in respect of the same transaction, Justice Achibonga said there was nothing legally wrong with preferring both offences in distinct counts.
The court, however, acknowledged that there cannot be a conviction for the offences of defrauding by false pretences and stealing if they arise from the same facts.
Interlocutory Appeal
Mr. Dame subsequently filed an interlocutory appeal challenging the High Court’s decision and followed it up with an application for stay of proceedings pending appeal.
That application was dismissed by the trial court, thereby opening the door for the defence lawyer to file a repeat application at the Court of Appeal. The Office of the Attorney General opposed the application.
Moving the motion before the Court of Appeal last Monday, Mr. Dame argued that the issues raised are fundamental and hinge on the accused’s right to a fair trial, such that allowing the trial to continue will occasion substantial miscarriage of justice.
He further contended that a charge sheet invokes the court’s jurisdiction and must be prepared in accordance with the law.
“We contend further that any defect which inhibits an accused person from knowing the particulars of the offence with which the accused is charged, and withholds material information about the offence, does not invoke the jurisdiction of the court,” Mr. Dame, a former Attorney General, argued.
Again, he argued that it is unfair for the accused to be subjected to a trial for stealing over payments spread across such a broad period.
“The facts say 86 transactions. Even if the Court considered this, there are more fundamental issues. There are no specificities. It is unfair for an accused to be subjected to such a trial,” he added.
The three-member panel, Justices Noble Nkrumah (Presiding), Lydia Osei Marfo, and George Boadi, in a ruling, said the charge sheet carries the superstructure of the trial and a challenge to that must be dealt with.
“We find the matters raised by the applicant to be exceptional and to warrant the grant of a stay. The application is granted,” the court held.
BY Gibril Abdul Razak
The post AG Heads To SC Over Court Halting Ex-NAFCO Boss Trial appeared first on DailyGuide Network.