By PYMNTS | October 22, 2026
Launching a FinTech often starts with a simple plan. Get the right state licenses, team up with a bank and start moving money. But success brings a new problem. Once a company adds overseas customers, large business clients or cryptocurrency services, that early setup can start to feel too small.
That growing pain is the focus of a Thursday (Oct. 22) article by attorneys Bryan Reyhani and Cristofer Kelman of law firm Taft that appeared on Mondaq. FinTechs often hit a turning point when their current licenses and partners no longer fit how the business runs. That can happen when a company wants to hold digital assets for big clients or move money across borders. It can also happen when a company relies too much on one partner bank, or when that bank’s caution keeps blocking new plans.
The warning signs don’t automatically mean a company needs its own bank charter, the article said. A new bank partner, a firm that safely holds assets for clients or another state license may solve the problem. Instead, a FinTech should ask which jobs it should keep handing to partners and which ones it has grown enough to handle on its own.
Hybrid licensing is a mix-and-match approach, according to the article. A company might keep its app in one business unit and run money transfers through a licensed sister company. It could use a bank for customer accounts and hire an outside firm to hold crypto. Each task goes to the party best equipped and approved to handle it.
We’d love to be your preferred source for news.
Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!
This only works if the details line up, the article said. Contracts, customer notices and the path money takes must all match how things really work. Regulators and banks look at what happens in practice, not at an org chart.
For more mature companies, there are two specialized options, according to the article. Wyoming offers a special type of bank charter for firms that want to take deposits and hold digital assets. These banks must keep enough reserves to cover every dollar that customers deposit. Puerto Rico offers a license built for companies serving customers outside the island. Since reforms in 2024, these firms can hold crypto for clients with the local regulator’s approval. They cannot run a crypto trading platform.
“The fastest route to market is rarely a straight line,” the article said.
Neither option is a shortcut, according to the article. Both demand money, leadership and a long approval process. Neither one wipes out federal rules on money laundering, securities laws or state licensing duties. Companies still need solid banking partners, and customers still need to know clearly which company they are dealing with.
Looking ahead, the rules for digital assets will likely stay complicated, the article said. The GENIUS Act, the federal stablecoin law passed in 2025, and other proposed reforms may bring some clarity. But companies will still answer to many regulators at once. Firms that bet on one future law to simplify everything could box themselves in.
FinTech should build in flexibility from day one, according to the article. That means legal review before launching any feature that changes how customer money is held or used. It means contracts that make it easy to switch banks or partners. And it means clean records that hold up through those changes.
The companies best positioned to grow will treat each licensing move as a planned step, the article said. Reacting to the latest product idea or partner demand is a riskier path.