The AISA president was detained on October 16 while heading to the CJP’s ‘Lehra Do Tiranga’ march
PTI Published 23.10.26, 07:35 PM
AISA chief Neha Bora being detained by the police during a protest against Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar, demanding his resignation over alleged irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, at Mandi House, in New Delhi, Friday, Oct. 16, 2026. PTI
The Delhi High Court on Friday declined a petition filed by All India Students’ Association (AISA) president Neha Bora against a police notice directing her to execute a peace bond before a special executive magistrate.
Justice Subramonium Prasad dismissed the writ petition at this stage, saying, “I am rejecting the writ petition at this juncture.”
The court, however, directed the special executive magistrate to provide Bora with all relevant material in the proceedings.
A detailed copy of the judgement is awaited.
The police notice, issued on October 17 under Section 126 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), asked the student leader to appear before the SEM on October 19 and show cause as to why she should not execute a personal bond of Rs 10,000 with one surety "for keeping peace for a period of enquiry".
Section 126 of the BNSS empowers the SEM to enforce such bond signing if there is credible information that a person is likely to breach peace, disturb public tranquillity, or commit a wrongful act that may cause disturbance.
Bora was taken into preventive detention on October 16 while she was on her way to join the Cockroach Janta Party's 'Lehra Do Tiranga' march in Delhi's Connaught Place. She was released on October 17.
In her petition, settled by lawyer Abhik Chimni, Bora said the police notice is vague, factually incorrect and contains no material or information to substantiate the "likelihood" of breach of peace.
The proceedings before the SEM are based on allegations of sloganeering at Mandi House on October 16, repeated protests around Jantar Mantar despite prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the BNSS, and instigating people to participate in the October 16 demonstration.
During the hearing on Thursday, Bora's senior counsel had argued that citizens did not need permission to hoist the national flag and there was nothing wrong in seeking regime change in a democracy.
