Syrian lawmakers have begun circulating a petition inside the People’s Assembly to advance a motion repealing Law No. 49 of 1980, the decree that criminalizes membership in the Muslim Brotherhood and mandates the death penalty. The effort reopens one of the most sensitive questions in Syria’s political transition: whether the movement, banned and persecuted for decades, could regain a legal foothold in national politics.
The initiative comes amid renewed statements from the Muslim Brotherhood affirming its intention to resume political activity, prompting fresh scrutiny of the transitional authority’s approach to party regulation and the boundaries of political participation in post‑war Syria.
Dismantling a Hafez al‑Assad Legacy
Abdel Nasser Houshan, chair of the People’s Assembly’s Constitutional and Legislative Affairs Committee, told Asharq Al‑Awsat that the proposal remains in the signature‑collection phase and has not yet been formally lodged with the assembly. Under internal rules, at least 17 members must endorse a motion before it can be drafted and referred to committee. Although some media outlets suggested the repeal might reach the floor in mid‑October, procedural steps were not completed in time, according to statements issued on October 13.
Law No. 49, enacted in July 1980 under Hafez al‑Assad, empowered the former regime to wage a sweeping campaign against the Muslim Brotherhood, resulting in mass imprisonment, exile, and persecution of thousands of members and sympathizers. While repealing the decree would mark a symbolic break with the coercive legal architecture of the past, it would not, on its own, settle the broader question of the group’s legal reintegration.
Despite broad sympathy for victims of past abuses, the Muslim Brotherhood continues to face criticism over its conduct during the Syrian conflict. Detractors accuse the movement of seeking to dominate opposition institutions, exacerbating political fragmentation, and mismanaging both political and humanitarian portfolios.
A Measure of Political Openness
The legislative push follows a September 27 meeting of the Muslim Brotherhood’s Shura Council, which produced a 16‑point communiqué addressing political, security, and economic developments and calling for political pluralism and clear party regulations. Analysts interpret the statement as a deliberate signal of the group’s intent to re‑establish a political presence inside Syria after decades of forced exile.
The fate of the repeal motion is widely viewed as a test of the transitional authority’s commitment to political openness. Delaying or shelving debate on Law No. 49 could deepen doubts about the government’s willingness to permit genuine party competition. Conversely, abolishing the law would remove a major legal barrier for individual members, though it would not automatically grant the organization the right to form a party or contest elections without a comprehensive regulatory framework governing political life.
Uncertainty also persists over whether Law No. 49 was effectively nullified when the “Victory Conference” announced the suspension of emergency and exceptional legislation on January 29, 2025. This ambiguity leaves the repeal initiative as a critical indicator of whether Syria’s transitional leadership intends to build a transparent, rules‑based system for political participation—or maintain a landscape where party activity remains subject to executive discretion and political bargaining.
This article was translated and edited by The Syrian Observer. The Syrian Observer has not verified the content of this story. Responsibility for the information and views set out in this article lies entirely with the author.
The post Syrian Lawmakers Move to Scrap Long‑Standing Ban on Muslim Brotherhood first appeared on The Syrian Observer.