![]()
Ukrainian officials and commentators are alleging that the Starlink restrictions might be connected to Washington’s pressure on Ukraine to halt strikes
TOI Correspondent from Washington: The raging debate in India over Elon Musk’s bid to muscle Starlink into the country has received a cautionary call after Ukraine reported on Wednesday that its military units suffered disruptions due to unexpected restrictions on Starlink terminals, affecting high-speed connectivity used in combat missions.Ukrainian officials and commentators are alleging that the Starlink restrictions might be connected to Washington’s pressure on Ukraine to halt strikes against Russian oil infrastructure. “Clearly, this action cannot be a coincidence and is linked to the current political situation,” Serhiy Beskrestnov, a Ukrainian military expert who advises President Volodymyr Zelensky on weapons technologies, wrote on a social media platform, as several US lawmakers and European leaders fumed about President Trump appearing to throw Kyiv under the bus after announcing a deal with Moscow to buy diesel.Starlink, operated by SpaceX (founded by Elon Musk) is a satellite internet constellation that provides high-speed, low-latency broadband internet access in underserved, rural, and remote locations where traditional cable or fiber-optic infrastructure is unavailable or unreliable. Musk and his company SpaceX have rendered matchless service to Ukraine, activating Starlink service to the country within days of the Russian invasion to help hospitals, emergency services and government offices stay connected during the war.
By some accounts, Ukraine now has more than 50,000 Starlink terminals.Ukrainian officials are now accusing SpaceX of crippling its drone missions among other effects, although Musk defenders say the restrictions appear to affect only military-grade Starshield, which is operated by the US government and isn't under SpaceX's control. The Trump administration and Starlink have not responded to the charges at the time of writing, but the very possibility illustrates the dilemma facing India of opening itself to a technology controlled by a company – that too owned by a partisan political hack – operating within another country’s political and regulatory system.Starlink has become a particularly contentious issue after Musk accused Indian business interests of blocking its entry to protect their monopolies, implicitly targeting Reliance Jio chairman Mukesh Ambani. New Delhi has rejected the suggestion that its regulatory framework is discriminatory. Starlink has secured important licences and authorisations but is reported to be awaiting security clearances and spectrum assignment before commercial operations can begin.A report titled Starlink and Risks for India from Takshashila Institution, released in April this year, has raised precisely this point: foreign control of connectivity and data security, and the vulnerability that comes from relying on a foreign private operator.Even ahead of Wednesday’s developments, the report had noted that Starlink's service availability had been altered or restricted during conflicts (such as in Ukraine) or used to bypass state blockades during civil unrest (such as in Iran), while warning that a foreign corporate decision, technical failure, or external pressure could disrupt critical communications in India during a crisis.For Kyiv, the timing could hardly be worse. Russia launched scores of ballistic missiles and drone attacks against Ukrainian targets this week, striking energy infrastructure and leaving approximately 600,000 people without electricity. The country is heading into another winter under bombardment, with its air defences under enormous strain, and President Trump transparently intent on turning the screws on Kyiv in an effort to end the war, even if it is in Russia’s terms.