10 low-cost international ETFs worth comparing on fees

Two international stock ETFs can hold nearly the same companies in nearly the same proportions and still charge fees that differ by several hundredths of a percentage point. In a single year, that gap is invisible. Compounded across decades of holding, it becomes money that stays with the fund company rather than the investor. The cheapest international stock ETFs in 2026 come from a short list of issuers: Vanguard, iShares, Schwab and State Street $STT's SPDR lineup. Each has spent more than a decade pushing expense ratios toward zero to win long-term assets.

The U.S. accounts for a large share of global stock market value, but not all of it. Companies based in Japan, the U.K., Germany, India and dozens of other markets bring earnings streams, currency exposure and sector weightings that a domestic-only portfolio misses. One fund tracking a benchmark such as the MSCI EAFE Index or the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index buys a single trade. That trade spans hundreds or thousands of companies across dozens of countries.

Fees in this category have held flat for years, because the largest issuers already price near the floor of what is commercially sustainable. A fund charging 0.03% has little reason to raise that number, since a rival would absorb the assets almost immediately. A cost comparison done today is therefore more durable than it might look — the gaps measured now are likely to hold.

What follows compares the lowest-cost options in three groups. All-world funds cover everything outside the U.S. in one ticker. Developed-markets funds exclude emerging economies, and emerging-markets funds are bought as a separate sleeve. Each entry names the ticker, the issuer, the benchmark index it tracks and its stated expense ratio. The final slide covers what matters beyond the headline fee, including index methodology, country classification and bid-ask spreads. None of this is a recommendation to buy a particular fund — it is a factual baseline for comparing what these funds cost.

Illustration: Quartz

VXUS charges an expense ratio of 0.05% and holds developed and emerging markets in a single ticker, making it one of the cheapest ways to buy a complete non-U.S. equity allocation. It tracks the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, which covers large, mid and small-cap companies across more than 45 countries.

The all-cap structure matters. Many rival international funds stop at large and mid-cap stocks, leaving out the smaller companies that make up the long tail of most national markets. VXUS reaches further down the size scale, and the result is a portfolio of several thousand holdings.

Country weightings follow each market's share of global capitalization outside the U.S. Japan, the U.K. and China generally sit at the top, with the remainder spread across dozens of smaller developed and emerging markets. No single company carries enough weight to drive returns on its own.

Because emerging markets are already included, an investor holding VXUS does not need a second fund to reach China, India or Brazil. The tradeoff is control. The emerging-markets share of the portfolio is set by the index, not chosen by the investor. Anyone who wants to overweight or underweight that sleeve has to add a separate fund, which undercuts the one-ticker logic.

Among all-world ex-U.S. funds, the 0.05% fee sits below the 0.07% charged by the comparable iShares fund, IXUS. Vanguard helped establish low-cost indexing as a retail product and has cut fees across its international lineup as iShares, Schwab and State Street $STT pushed prices down.

VXUS trades on Nasdaq $NDAQ and prices continuously through the session, rather than once at the close the way a mutual fund does. Pairing it with a U.S. total market fund covers most of the world's investable stock market in two trades.

Scale is the other cost advantage. Years of inflows have given VXUS heavy average daily volume and narrow bid-ask spreads. That keeps the real cost of buying and selling shares low, on top of the annual fee.

Illustration: Quartz

IXUS charges an expense ratio of 0.07% and tracks the MSCI ACWI ex USA Investable Market Index. That benchmark reaches large, mid and small-cap stocks across developed and emerging countries outside the U.S. The fee sits two basis points above the cheapest combined international fund, which still leaves IXUS in the low-cost tier.

BlackRock $BLK's iShares arm launched the fund in 2012 as part of its Core series, a group priced for people who buy once and hold for years. The same series contains IEFA for developed markets and IEMG for emerging markets. An investor can take the single-ticker route through IXUS or split the allocation in two and set the mix directly.

Coverage runs to thousands of individual stocks across more than 40 countries. Japan, the U.K. and China generally sit among the heaviest country weights, reflecting how much market value those economies carry outside the U.S.

The letters IMI at the end of the index name signal that small-cap companies are included, not just the large and mid-cap names that many international benchmarks stop at. That widens the holdings list well beyond a large-cap-only fund tracking the same regions.

The index provider is the main structural difference between IXUS and Vanguard's VXUS, which follows a FTSE benchmark instead. MSCI and FTSE maintain separate frameworks for deciding whether a market counts as developed or emerging, and they review those decisions on their own schedules. The result is two funds with similar aims and slightly different country lists.

Assets and daily trading volume have climbed steadily since launch, which matters for anyone building a position through regular purchases. Investors who already hold other iShares Core funds sometimes keep IXUS for consistency of methodology and reporting within one fund family. The two-basis-point premium over the cheapest competitor amounts to little on a modest balance, though it grows with account size and holding period.

Illustration: Quartz

SCHF charges an expense ratio of 0.06% and covers developed international markets only, leaving emerging economies out entirely. It follows the FTSE Developed ex US Index, which holds large and mid-cap companies in markets including Japan, the U.K., France, Germany and Australia. Small-cap stocks sit outside that benchmark, so the fund owns fewer companies than developed-markets funds built on all-cap indexes.

Charles Schwab $SCHW built its ETF lineup around low headline fees to attract cost-conscious long-term investors, and SCHF has sat near the bottom of the developed-markets price range since its 2009 launch. The exclusion of emerging markets is the defining structural choice here. An investor who wants exposure to China, India or Brazil has to buy a separate emerging-markets fund alongside it.

That separation is the point for some buyers. A combined all-world-ex-U.S. fund assigns an emerging-markets weighting automatically, based on market capitalization. Holding SCHF instead lets an investor set that weighting by hand and change it without touching the developed-markets position. Emerging markets tend to show higher volatility than established economies and respond to different political and economic pressures. Sizing that portion deliberately keeps the decision with the investor rather than the index provider.

The portfolio concentrates in large, established multinationals. Many are names U.S. investors recognize even though the shares trade primarily on foreign exchanges — Toyota $TM, Nestlé and Shell $SHEL among them. Japan and the U.K. typically rank as the top two country weightings, a reflection of how large those two stock markets are within the developed world outside the U.S.

Schwab imposes no account minimums on its ETFs and charges no trading commissions through its own brokerage platform. That matters for anyone building a position through small, regular purchases rather than one lump sum. The 0.06% fee has held steady for years. Schwab's pattern in this category has been to match or undercut rivals on price rather than leave a competitor with a cheaper equivalent fund.

Illustration: Quartz

VEA charges an expense ratio of 0.03%, placing it among the single cheapest international equity ETFs in any category. It tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, which covers large, mid and small-cap companies across developed markets outside the U.S.

The all-cap construction separates VEA from several competing developed-markets funds. Small-cap stocks sit alongside the large and mid-cap names, so the fund captures a wider slice of each market's listed companies rather than only its biggest firms. Holdings number more than 3,900 stocks across roughly 25 developed countries, with Japan, the U.K. and Canada typically carrying the largest country weightings.

That low fee reflects Vanguard's pricing approach to its highest-volume, most commoditized index products. Developed-markets exposure ranks among the most heavily demanded international categories. Competition has pushed this fund's cost below even Vanguard's own combined international fund, VXUS, which carries emerging markets too.

VEA holds no emerging-markets stocks. Investors who want China, India, Brazil or other developing economies in the mix need a separate allocation, and the common pairing is Vanguard's own emerging-markets fund, VWO. Plenty of advisor-built model portfolios use the two together instead of one combined fund. Splitting them allows independent rebalancing between developed and emerging sleeves, and it leaves more room for tax-loss harvesting in taxable accounts.

The fund dates to 2007 and has built a large asset base since, making it one of the most heavily traded developed-markets ETFs available. Scale of that kind keeps bid-ask spreads tight even on sizable orders, which lowers the real cost of owning the fund beyond the stated management fee.

For an investor whose main filter is cost on developed-market exposure, 0.03% is difficult to undercut among broadly diversified funds. The trade-off is the deliberate omission of emerging markets, which means VEA works as part of an international allocation rather than the whole of one.

Illustration: Quartz

At an expense ratio of 0.07%, IEFA covers developed markets across Europe, Australasia and the Far East through the MSCI EAFE Investable Market Index. EAFE serves as industry shorthand for developed international stock markets outside the U.S. and Canada.

The Canada exclusion separates IEFA from several of its direct competitors. Funds built on FTSE's developed-markets benchmarks include Canadian companies, and IEFA does not. Investors who already own Canadian stocks through a separate holding, or who get that exposure inside a North American fund, may treat the exclusion as a feature rather than a gap, since it removes overlap they would otherwise have to track themselves.

IEFA holds more than 2,500 stocks across developed countries including Japan, the U.K., France, Switzerland and Germany. The investable market index it follows reaches down into small-cap names rather than stopping at large and mid-cap companies. That widens the holdings count against funds tracking standard large- and mid-cap EAFE benchmarks.

The fund belongs to the iShares Core series, BlackRock $BLK's low-cost lineup aimed at long-term index investors. It ranks among the largest international ETFs by assets, and that size keeps bid-ask spreads narrow even though its fee sits a few basis points above the cheapest developed-markets options.

Target $TGT-date retirement funds and robo-advisor model portfolios often use IEFA as a core international building block. Plenty of investors end up owning it without ever picking it off a fund screener themselves.

MSCI EAFE dates to the 1960s, making it older than most of the FTSE and S&P benchmarks that competing funds follow. Some investors prefer MSCI-based products for that longer index record and the deeper performance history it allows. Return differences between MSCI EAFE and FTSE Developed ex US have tended to be small over most measurement periods, with the Canada question accounting for much of the gap that does appear.

Illustration: Quartz

SPDW charges an expense ratio of 0.03%, placing it at the very bottom of the cost range for broad developed-markets funds. It tracks the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index, a benchmark from S&P Dow Jones Indices that reaches large, mid and small-cap companies in developed economies outside the U.S.

State Street $STT Global Advisors built the Portfolio series, which includes SPDW, as a low-priced lineup aimed at buy-and-hold investors. The firm's older SPDR funds, designed largely around trading liquidity, carry different pricing. Splitting the shelf this way mirrors what Vanguard and iShares did with their own core ranges.

The fund holds thousands of stocks across more than 20 developed countries. Japan and the U.K. carry heavy weightings, a reflection of how large those two markets are relative to other non-U.S. developed economies. The BMI in the index name stands for broad market index, S&P's label for a benchmark that extends down into small-cap stocks rather than stopping at mid-caps. S&P's classification system produces country and sector allocations broadly in line with rival developed-markets funds, though the edges differ. Which countries a provider counts as developed, and where it sets the small-cap cutoff, varies by index family.

SPDW holds less in total assets than the largest developed-markets ETFs, and its average daily trading volume runs correspondingly lower. An investor making monthly contributions or holding for years is unlikely to feel that difference. Someone moving a large block of shares at once may face a wider bid-ask spread on a thinly traded fund, a one-time cost separate from the annual fee.

The fund covers the developed world only. China, India, Brazil and other developing economies are absent, so an investor who wants that exposure needs a second holding alongside it. For those assembling an international allocation in two pieces and prioritizing the lowest stated fee on the developed side, SPDW sits level with the cheapest competing option at 0.03%.

Illustration: Quartz

VWO charges an expense ratio of 0.07% and ranks among the largest emerging-markets ETFs by assets. It tracks the FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap China A Inclusion Index, which covers large, mid and small-cap companies in developing economies including China, India, Taiwan and Brazil.

Funds covering developing economies usually cost more than their developed-world equivalents. The underlying markets trade less liquidly and carry higher transaction costs, which makes replicating an index more expensive for the issuer. Against that backdrop, 0.07% sits at the low end of the category, far below what actively managed emerging-markets mutual funds have historically charged.

One structural difference separates VWO from several competitors: it leaves out South Korea. FTSE treats South Korea as a developed market, while MSCI treats it as emerging. That single classification decision ripples through country weightings and makes performance comparisons between VWO and MSCI-based emerging-markets funds less clean than the matching labels suggest.

China usually occupies the largest single-country position in the fund, with India and Taiwan behind it. Those three economies together account for a substantial share of the portfolio, so VWO's results lean more heavily on a small group of markets than a broad developed-markets fund would. The "China A Inclusion" language in the index name refers to mainland-listed Chinese shares, which the benchmark holds alongside Hong Kong and offshore listings.

The all-cap construction means small-cap companies in developing economies sit in the portfolio alongside the large multinationals, pushing the holdings count into the thousands.

VWO launched in 2005, giving it one of the longer operating records in the category. Its asset base and daily trading volume work in an investor's favor when moving large sums, since bid-ask spreads tend to stay narrow even when developing-market stocks swing sharply. The fund publishes its country and holdings breakdown, which is the quickest way to confirm how much South Korea's absence shifts the exposure against an MSCI-based alternative.

Illustration: Quartz

IEMG charges an expense ratio of 0.09% and tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, covering large, mid and small-cap stocks across developing economies. It ranks among the largest emerging-markets ETFs by assets.

South Korea is the defining difference between IEMG and Vanguard's VWO. MSCI counts South Korea as an emerging market and includes it in the index IEMG follows, while FTSE treats it as developed. Choosing between the two funds means choosing between two definitions of the asset class, not two prices for the same companies.

China, India and Taiwan rank among the heaviest country weightings in IEMG, as they do across most emerging-markets index funds. South Korean exposure shifts the exact percentages relative to FTSE-based alternatives. The fund holds more than 2,500 individual stocks, which extends its reach past the handful of economies sitting at the top of the index.

The "Investable Market Index" wording in the benchmark name signals small-cap inclusion. Funds that track the standard MSCI Emerging Markets Index stop at large and mid-cap companies, so IEMG captures a wider slice of each market than those alternatives do.

The 0.09% fee sits above the cheapest funds in this category, including VWO and State Street $STT's SPEM, both at 0.07%. The difference is marginal on a modest balance. On a large position held for decades, it turns into a measurable drag. BlackRock $BLK has held the figure steady for years rather than trimming it, even as rival issuers compete hard on emerging-markets pricing.

IEMG's audience extends well past investors who buy it directly. It sits inside target-date retirement funds and in model portfolios built by financial advisors and automated investing platforms. That institutional demand has pushed daily trading volume high, which helps keep the practical cost of entering or exiting a position low on top of the annual fee.

Illustration: Quartz

SPEM charges an expense ratio of 0.07%, putting it level with Vanguard's VWO at the low end of emerging-markets pricing. It tracks the S&P Emerging BMI Index, a benchmark from S&P Dow Jones Indices covering large, mid and small-cap companies in countries S&P classifies as emerging. The BMI label marks a broad market index, one that extends down into small-cap stocks rather than stopping at mid caps.

State Street $STT Global Advisors placed SPEM inside its Portfolio series, the lineup aimed at investors who hold positions for years rather than trade them. Those funds were priced to match or undercut the cheapest rival products from Vanguard and BlackRock $BLK in the same categories.

Country weightings lean toward China, India and Taiwan, the pattern across nearly every broad fund of this type, given the relative size of those stock markets. The exact percentages do not match competing funds. S&P maintains its own classification framework, separate from the systems FTSE and MSCI use. The three providers do not always agree on where a given country belongs. South Korea is the one worth checking before treating two emerging-markets funds as interchangeable.

Assets in SPEM sit below those in VWO and IEMG, and that shows up in average daily trading volume. Thinner volume can mean a wider bid-ask spread, particularly in quiet stretches of the trading day. An investor adding a few hundred dollars a month will rarely notice the difference. Someone moving a large block in a single order should check the current spread first, since that cost is paid up front and separately from the annual fee.

SPEM offers a fee level with the cheapest competitors, wide coverage of developing markets and a third index methodology to weigh against the FTSE and MSCI versions. Investors who already hold State Street funds elsewhere may find that keeping international exposure with a single issuer simplifies record-keeping and rebalancing across accounts.