Ukraine has rejected the characterization of a reported four-point peace proposal as a joint US-European plan, saying the ideas reflect the position of only part of the American administration’s negotiating team.
Dmytro Lytvyn, communications advisor to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, responded on Tuesday, Oct. 13, to an opinion column in The Washington Post by columnist David Ignatius.
JOIN US ON TELEGRAM
Follow our coverage of the war on the @Kyivpost_official.
“It is not ‘the US and European countries,’” Lytvyn told journalists.
“This is an outline of the vision of some members of the US team at the meeting in Florida, which was attended by Americans, Ukrainians and Europeans. Good PR by the Americans,” he added.
Lytvyn did not say that Ukraine had accepted or formally rejected the individual proposals outlined in the column.
What The Washington Post described
Citing an unnamed US official familiar with the negotiations, Ignatius wrote that American officials were attempting to develop a broad package offering postwar economic and security benefits to both Ukraine and Russia in exchange for territorial compromises.
“We need to make the problem and the solution bigger to help both sides see what the postwar situation would be – and then make concessions,” the official said.
The ideas were discussed during a six-hour meeting in Florida on Friday, Oct. 9, hosted by Trump’s presidential envoys, son-in-law Jared Kushner and personal friend and golf partner Steve Witkoff.
Other Topics of Interest
Putin’s Protector in the White House
The world is astounded by how Trump’s worship of Putin has led him to renounce America’s noblest ideals.
The talks included Ukrainian officials and representatives of the UK, France and Germany. The meeting was held at the Shell Bay Golf Club in Hallandale Beach, a development personally owned by Witkoff.
The newspaper described four proposed components.
Reconstruction funding for Ukraine
The first component would establish a framework for financing Ukraine’s postwar reconstruction, reportedly involving the World Bank and investment company BlackRock.
The funds would be used to rebuild destroyed regions, restore the Ukrainian economy and support the families of soldiers who were killed or wounded.
According to the US official cited by the newspaper, negotiators asked Kyiv to provide detailed estimates of its financial needs and assurances that reconstruction funds would be protected from corruption and postwar profiteering.
The column said Ukraine had not yet supplied the requested figures but was expected to do so within days if the negotiations continued.
Article 5-style security guarantees
The second component would provide Ukraine with security commitments from the US and European countries.
The unnamed official described the proposed guarantees as equivalent to NATO’s Article 5 collective-defense clause, with Western countries pledging to respond militarily if Russia attacked Ukraine again.
Russia would separately negotiate agreements with European states addressing its claimed security concerns. The column did not explain what concessions or restrictions those agreements could involve.
Russian energy returns to Europe
The third component would seek to integrate the Ukrainian, Russian and European economies through an energy agreement.
One option reportedly discussed was a pipeline carrying Russian oil and gas to Europe, with Ukraine and Russia sharing the profits.
Such an arrangement would provide Moscow with long-term access to the European energy market while potentially lowering energy prices in Europe, according to the White House official.
The proposed agreement would also establish conditions and a timetable for lifting existing economic sanctions against Russia.
No details were provided about which pipeline might be used, who would operate it or how revenues would be divided.
Ceasefire along the current front line
The fourth and most politically difficult component would involve a ceasefire along the existing front line, described by negotiators as the “line of control.”
Russia would abandon its original objective of conquering all of Ukraine but retain control of the Ukrainian territory it occupies when the ceasefire begins, including parts of the Donbas.
For Ukraine, this would mean tolerating continued Russian control without necessarily granting legal recognition to Moscow’s annexation claims.
The column noted that establishing such a line would be complicated by daily battlefield movements.
White House pressure over Russian refineries
The discussion also covered Ukrainian attacks on Russian oil refineries, although this was not presented as one of the plan’s four components.
Kushner and Witkoff reportedly asked Ukraine to halt those attacks and warned Kyiv that Trump intended to conclude his diesel arrangement with Russia.
The Trump administration had previously pressed the Ukrainian delegation to stop striking Russian refineries, arguing that the attacks were contributing to higher fuel prices.
Zelensky later proposed a reciprocal “diesel deal” under which Ukraine would stop targeting Russian energy infrastructure if the US guaranteed protection for Ukraine’s electricity system.
The four-point proposal has not been published as an official document, approved by the participating governments or presented as an agreement accepted by Russia.
Kyiv Post is Ukraine’s first and oldest English news organization, reporting since 1995. Its international reach – 90% of readers are outside of Ukraine – make it truly Ukraine’s global voice.