
The Briefing
- Michigan Republican Senate nominee Mike Rogers refused to call Trump's Iran war a mistake in a new NBC interview, offering only "We'll find out" when pressed by anchor Tom Llamas.
- Rogers praised Operation Epic Fury enthusiastically when it launched in February 2026 and said publicly he had no problem giving Trump authority to continue it — but reversed course in September once fuel prices soared.
- Recent polls show Democrat Abdul El-Sayed holding a narrow advantage, with the race well within margins of error heading into November 3.
Michigan Republican Senate nominee Mike Rogers offered the political equivalent of a non-answer when NBC Nightly News anchor Tom Llamas asked him Wednesday whether President Donald Trump made a mistake going to war with Iran. His answer, delivered to a national audience with three weeks remaining before Election Day: "We'll find out."
Both Rogers and his Democratic rival, Abdul El-Sayed, appeared in the same broadcast — an unusually high-profile moment for a Senate race that operatives in both parties now consider one of the most consequential contests of the 2026 midterms.
A War That Reshaped the Race
Trump ordered military strikes on Iran on February 28, 2026, in a joint U.S.-Israeli operation designated Epic Fury, without prior congressional authorization. Rogers went public with his support that same day, posting on X that Iran represented "an imminent threat to our country" that "must not have a nuclear weapon." In the weeks that followed, he praised the campaign's progress, telling a radio audience in April that Iran had become "absolutely a toothless wonder" and calling the conflict "the best opportunity for peace in the Middle East I think I've ever seen in my lifetime." He also said he had no objection to giving Trump congressional authority to press on with the campaign.
The September Pivot at the Grocery Store
That enthusiasm faded as the economic toll reached Michigan voters' wallets. By late September, Rogers had cut a campaign ad filmed from a grocery store calling for a quick end to the conflict, framing the reversal around rising costs rather than any shift in principle. Michigan motorists were paying roughly $4.43 per gallon for regular gasoline in early October — up from about $3.07 a year earlier — while diesel averaged $6.59, compared with $3.71 twelve months prior. Rogers has not publicly walked back his endorsement of Trump's original decision to open hostilities.
A Track Record CNN Documented
The evolution of Rogers' position handed his opponent a ready line of attack. A CNN KFile review found that Rogers consistently defended the operation in conservative media appearances through July — calling it "long overdue" when it launched in February, predicting in April that it would conclude quickly as the military worked down its target list, and still defending its strategic rationale in May even as he acknowledged the toll on fuel prices.

What the Polls Said
By the time a September Fox News poll found that 60 percent of voters considered the decision to strike Iran the wrong call, Rogers had already pivoted his messaging. The same survey found that 71 percent of voters believed the Trump administration lacked a clear strategy for ending the war, and Trump's overall approval stood at 39 percent, with 61 percent disapproving.
El-Sayed Presses His Consistency Advantage
El-Sayed, who has opposed the war since its opening hours, used the NBC interview and subsequent statements to frame the contest as one of principle versus convenience. He accused Rogers of reversing course only once fuel prices climbed, citing Rogers' earlier statements that Trump was "absolutely right" to launch the strikes and that Michiganders were "better off today than we were when it started." At the October 8 debate in Grand Rapids, Rogers himself called the war "a disaster" — a word that stood in stark contrast to seven months of public backing. Michigan Democrats have cited analyst estimates that place the daily military price tag at roughly $891 million to $1 billion, a figure El-Sayed has used to argue the war is draining resources that could go to working families.
The Stakes in a Battleground State
The seat being contested — held by Democrats since Carl Levin first won it in 1978 — carries enormous weight for both parties. Rogers is making his second consecutive Senate run in Michigan: in 2024, he came agonizingly close to winning the state's other seat, with his race against newly elected Senator Elissa Slotkin decided by roughly 18,000 votes out of more than five million cast, one of the closest Senate outcomes that year.
Recent surveys show El-Sayed with a narrow edge. A Fox News Michigan poll conducted September 24–28 placed El-Sayed at 50 percent and Rogers at 49; a YouGov poll released October 6 gave El-Sayed a one-point edge, 49 to 48; and a Quantus survey from October 7 showed El-Sayed ahead 48 to 47. All three results fall within their respective margins of error, underscoring how genuinely competitive the race remains.
Heading Into the Final 19 Days
With less than three weeks until Election Day, the Iran war sits at the center of this race — economically, politically and morally. Rogers' "we'll find out" response captures a dilemma confronting Republican candidates across the 2026 map: how to remain aligned with a Trump policy that energizes the base while managing voter frustration over fuel prices, grocery bills and a conflict whose endpoint still seems distant.
El-Sayed has made his unbroken opposition the central argument of his closing stretch. Whether Michigan's independent voters ultimately reward that consistency or swing toward Rogers will help determine which party controls the Senate when the returns come in November 4.
© {{Year}} Latin Times. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.
