Stewarts is a member of the Tatler Advisory, which is a paid for membership program operated by Tatler.
For many, relationship breakdown is highly disorientating. By the time clients seek legal advice, the ground beneath them has usually already shifted. Decisions about children, finances and identity are being made in parallel with a profound emotional recalibration. Lawyers and therapists, in different ways, help clients steady themselves through this difficult time and resolve disputes arising from relationship breakdown as constructively as possible, in the interests of the whole family.
Increasingly, this work is being done together, as Sophie Chapman and Dr Kate Younger discuss.
Why are lawyers and therapists working more closely in family disputes?
Sophie Chapman:
Family lawyers have always known that separation is not experienced as a neat legal problem. Clients often make significant, long-term decisions at a point of acute emotional strain. In those circumstances, even highly capable individuals can find their ability to process advice, take a measured view and make decisions compromised.
Historically, lawyers and therapists have worked alongside each other but largely in parallel. What is changing is a recognition that, in some cases, a more coordinated approach produces better outcomes for clients. We see the benefits of this for many clients at Stewarts. This does not involve any blurring of roles. As lawyers, we still advise, and our therapist colleagues support, but the two roles are not impermeable as has historically typically been the case.
A client who feels overwhelmed or locked in stressful legal proceedings can often struggle to engage fully with legal advice, however clear. When that emotional pressure is addressed (for
example, through dialogue between their lawyer and therapist or the therapist joining key strategic meetings), it may enable clients to think more clearly and, in turn, to act more constructively, facilitating an earlier conclusion to disputes.
Kate Younger:
From a therapeutic perspective, separation rarely affects just one aspect of a person’s life. Rather, it can feel like a bomb detonating, where everything changes all at once, and the impact is far reaching. Specifically, ruptures in one’s sense of self, self-worth, routine, family roles and expectations for the future. Collectively, this can compromise their ability to understand their own relational wound, let alone absorb legal advice, make decisions or communicate effectively with others, particularly when threat or conflict is at the fore.
The legal and psychological dimensions are not separate; they are constantly interacting, and at times, impacting one another. So, they are best thought of and addressed collaboratively. A relational wound often benefits therapeutically from a relational approach. For example, at The Blue Door Practice, individual therapists will consult with family or couple therapists to join up therapeutic care. In our experience, that interdisciplinary work between lawyers and therapists can do the same.
How does emotional strain impact the legal process?
Sophie Chapman:
One of the central challenges is that clients are being asked to make careful, strategic and emotionally charged decisions with long-lasting impacts at precisely the moment they may feel least equipped to do so.
In higher-conflict cases, positions can quickly harden and become polarised. What begins as a disagreement about arrangements for children or finances can take on a broader significance, engaging triggers from the relationship or personal values, such as fairness, a need for recognition or even identity. At that point, it naturally becomes harder for clients to step back or absorb advice with any real detachment.
Our role is to help resolve disputes, protect a client’s position where necessary, and do our utmost to prevent matters from escalating. Where a client can remain more grounded, which is often where therapeutic support can play a fundamental role, the process tends to be more focused and, ultimately, more productive. Equally, when we as lawyers understand the client’s experience, both within the relationship and its aftermath, we can advise and support them better through the legal process.
Kate Younger:
Separation, whether wanted or not, can be seen as a (protracted) traumatic event, loaded with loss, endings and uncertainty, all things that humans arguably find quite difficult. Seen through a trauma lens, people tend to react in one of four ways: fight (becoming combative), flight (avoiding the situation), freeze (shutting down) or fawn (appeasing or people-pleasing). And this is what we see happening time and time again in the therapy room as they work through this separation trauma.
These reactions can have a profound impact on the legal process. Some people can be frozen by fear of attack from their separating partner, and so too does the legal process freeze. Others become combative and use the legal process as a way to ‘right the wrongs’ of the relationship by making unrealistic demands. Again, the legal process gets drawn out. Others repeat the wounds of the relationship by subjugating their needs in the separation agreement, as they did in the relationship.
When children are involved, there can be an added layer of complexity. Often, people’s
patterns become amplified, either in an attempt to protect or weaponise the children or because of unresolved guilt or low mood, for example. Children typically have highly tuned emotional antennae, and so they are particularly sensitive to these dynamics. Sharing observations of these sorts of patterns in an interdisciplinary way can be hugely helpful to both the legal process and the therapeutic journey.
Where are the boundaries between legal advice and therapy?
Sophie Chapman:
Clear legal advice remains central when embarking on formal separation, disputes about children and navigating life in the aftermath of relationship breakdown. Clients need a realistic understanding of their position and the available options, which does not change when working alongside therapists.
Working collaboratively with therapists can shape the conditions in which clients can engage with advice, as well as give us reasoned instructions. It is sometimes assumed that emotional support will soften or dilute legal strategy, but in practice the opposite is often true: clients who feel steadier tend to make better, more durable decisions. In my experience, collaborative work between lawyers and therapists can facilitate early resolution while helping contain legal costs.
Kate Younger:
The distinction between our roles is critical. I would never seek to advise on litigation or advocate for a particular outcome. At the Blue Door Practice, our focus is on helping clients stabilise and process the separation and its aftermath. Working collaboratively allows a more joined-up understanding of how the client is coping and the optimal conditions for them to navigate the legal process. Without that, clients can find themselves repeating the same experiences in separate professional spaces, without legal and psychological lenses fully connecting, which adds to the burden of their experience.
The aim is not to merge or duplicate roles, but to provide a more holistic, emotionally supportive service for the client. Remember, at this time, people are often not their best functioning selves, so things can easily be misunderstood or get lost in translation. Having access to interdisciplinary working can help support both the legal and therapeutic processes and client outcomes (financially and emotionally).
Is this approach particularly relevant in complex or high-value cases?
Sophie Chapman:
Often, yes. Many of our clients are dealing not just with separation, but with businesses, trusts, international arrangements or public profiles, and so the legal issues they face rarely sit in isolation. It is also extremely common for our clients to be concerned about privacy and reputation, as well as cross-border uncertainty, all of which can increase the pressure on them at any given time.
Our clients are often high-performing individuals who operate in spheres where they are accustomed to integrated professional advice, whether in the form of wealth management, healthcare or reputation management. In our experience at Stewarts, our clients’ expectations are changing, and they are increasingly receptive to collaborative, interdisciplinary work.
Kate Younger:
In our experience at The Blue Door Practice, it is possibly even more important. All of the variables Sophie mentions make the psychological demands on the individual even greater. Loosely put, the greater the demands, the greater the likelihood of reacting with fight, flight, freeze or fawn, and the greater the potential catastrophic impact on their psychological wellbeing and settlement. Like Sophie, I feel clients value the collaborative way we work and, in particular, how it helps streamline additional and often complex demands. We truly become their psycho-legal team, and this team mentality can add huge emotional value.
What do you hope clients gain from this approach?
Sophie Chapman:
Clarity, confidence, empowerment, and perhaps above all the capacity to weather the current storm as adeptly as possible, and to be able to look back on this period in their lives from a place of stability. Separation is often one of the most destabilising periods of a person’s life, so if clients can think clearly and keep sight of longer-term outcomes, the process is usually more constructive.
Kate Younger:
Primarily, a sense that they are truly understood and not navigating this alone.
The aim is not to remove conflict entirely, which would be unrealistic. Rather, it is to help
clients with how they engage with conflict, so that they can move through it with greater
steadiness, support and a sense of knowing how to control what they can control, namely what
goes on in their lane. In doing so, this joined-up approach tends to benefit not just the
individuals involved but also their wider family. In this way, it is a challenge that enables
growth. From the traumatic bomb site, huge possibilities can grow.
Advisory is Tatler’s trusted network of influential private client experts, all at the pinnacle of their profession. From Family Law to Property, our hub of elite practitioners have the gilt-edged expertise necessary to advise UHNW and HNW individuals. Find out about Stewarts here.