10 companies that top the Fortune 500 profit rankings

The Fortune 500 ranks American companies by revenue, not by what they keep. That choice explains why a grocery chain earning pennies of margin on each dollar of sales can rank above a software company that keeps several times as much profit. Revenue measures how much money moves through a business. Net income measures how much of it survives the trip through costs, interest, and taxes.

That gap matters to more than accountants. Investors watch net income because it is the pool of cash a company can use to pay dividends, buy back stock, fund research, or build factories. Workers and unions cite it in contract negotiations. Lawmakers reach for it when debating corporate tax rates or windfall levies on energy producers. Revenue can be bought with discounts and volume. Profit is harder to manufacture.

Sort the same 500 companies by earnings instead of sales and a different roster rises to the top. The most profitable Fortune 500 companies repeat year after year: Apple $AAPL, Berkshire Hathaway $BRK.B, Alphabet $GOOGL, Microsoft $MSFT, Meta $META Platforms, the largest U.S. banks, and the two American oil majors. Their business models have almost nothing in common. One sells app subscriptions that cost near zero to deliver to an additional customer. Another pulls crude out of the Permian Basin at a price set by global markets it cannot influence. A third collects membership dues before a shopper puts anything in a cart.

What they share is a mechanism that converts enormous scale into earnings rather than just into sales volume. For some it is software economics. For others it is the spread between deposit rates and lending rates, or the right to invest insurance premiums before claims come due.

The 10 companies below have a sustained record near the top of that profit ranking. The focus here is on how each one actually makes its money. Exact annual figures move with oil prices, interest rates, and the stock market, but the underlying machinery stays recognizable from year to year.

Illustration: Quartz

Apple $AAPL's profit comes from a combination few hardware companies manage: a large installed base of iPhone owners and a services business that keeps earning from those owners long after the phone is sold. Hardware supplies the scale. Software and subscriptions supply the margin.

The iPhone remains Apple's single largest source of revenue, and it works as the entry point to everything else. Once a customer owns one, Apple can sell App Store purchases, iCloud storage, Apple Music, Apple TV+, AppleCare, and payment services through Apple Pay. The infrastructure behind those products already exists, so each additional subscriber adds revenue without a matching increase in cost. Apple's services segment carries considerably higher gross margins than its devices, which is why overall profitability has held up even as smartphone replacement cycles stretch out in mature markets such as the U.S. and western Europe.

Control of its own silicon reinforces the margin picture. The A-series chips in iPhones and the M-series processors in Macs are designed in house and built to Apple's specification. That shift removed the markup Apple once paid Intel $INTC for Mac processors and gave the company tighter control over performance and power consumption. Designing the chip also means Apple sets its own roadmap instead of waiting on a supplier's.

Scale gives Apple unusual leverage over the rest of its supply chain. Multiyear purchase commitments for displays, memory, camera modules, and assembly capacity let it negotiate component pricing smaller phone makers cannot match, and the volume keeps manufacturing partners dependent on Apple's orders.

Capital returns complete the picture. Apple has spent heavily on share repurchases over the past decade, steadily reducing the number of shares outstanding. That mechanism lifts earnings per share even in years when total net income grows slowly, and it reflects a deliberate use of the cash the business generates rather than an accident of accounting. Hardware volume, services margin, in-house chips, supplier leverage, and buybacks together keep Apple at or near the top of any ranking of American corporate profits.

Illustration: Quartz

Berkshire Hathaway $BRK.B's reported profit is the hardest figure on this list to compare with anyone else's, because accounting rules force it to run paper gains and losses on its stock portfolio through net income. Reported earnings can swing by tens of billions of dollars in a year while the operating businesses underneath do nothing unusual.

The rule took effect in 2018. Before that, Berkshire recorded a gain or a loss only when it actually sold a holding. Warren Buffett has told shareholders to disregard the swings and read operating earnings instead, the measure that excludes those unrealized marks.

The businesses producing that operating profit are substantial on their own. Insurance sits at the center, through GEICO, National Indemnity, and a large reinsurance operation. BNSF Railway moves freight across the western two-thirds of the U.S. Berkshire Hathaway Energy owns regulated utilities. Dozens of smaller subsidiaries sit beneath them, from See's Candies to Dairy Queen to Duracell.

Insurance supplies something no other company here has: float. Policyholders pay premiums upfront and claims arrive later, sometimes years later, which leaves Berkshire holding money it has not yet paid out. It invests that money for its own account and keeps the returns. After the Federal Reserve raised rates in 2022, the company's very large cash and Treasury bill position began producing substantial interest income carrying no underwriting risk.

The equity portfolio adds a steadier contribution as well. Dividends from long-held stakes in Coca-Cola $KO and American Express $AXP flow into operating earnings no matter what the share prices do in a given quarter.

Overhead stays small. The Omaha headquarters employs a few dozen people to oversee a group with hundreds of thousands of workers, and the managers of each subsidiary run their own operations with little direction from the center. Buffett ran the company for six decades and named vice chairman Greg Abel as his successor as chief executive. That decentralized setup keeps out the layers of corporate staff that add cost at conglomerates of comparable size.

Illustration: Quartz

Alphabet $GOOGL earns most of its profit from digital advertising sold against Google Search and YouTube, a business where serving one more ad costs almost nothing once the data centers and ranking systems exist. The distance between heavy fixed infrastructure costs and near-zero incremental cost is where the margin comes from.

Search advertising runs as a continuous auction. Advertisers bid for placement against queries that signal commercial intent, and because Google handles the large majority of the world's search traffic, those auctions stay competitive in a way smaller engines cannot match. Advertisers go where the audience is, bid prices hold up, and Alphabet collects the spread without manufacturing a physical product.

YouTube adds a second advertising surface with a different cost structure. Creators build the video library rather than Alphabet, and the company shares revenue with them instead of financing production the way a studio or a subscription streaming service does. Content costs stay variable and tied to money the platform has already earned.

Google Cloud reshaped the profit picture more recently. The division spent years absorbing heavy capital spending on servers and data centers while losing money against Amazon $AMZN Web Services and Microsoft $MSFT Azure. It reached full-year operating profitability in 2023 as that capacity filled, turning a long-running drag into a contributor.

Alphabet also funds a set of smaller ventures grouped as Other Bets, including the self-driving unit Waymo. Those units lose money and are paid for out of advertising earnings, which means the ad business carries the company's entire experimental program and still posts high margins.

Regulation is the open question. A U.S. federal judge ruled in August 2024 that Google illegally maintained a monopoly in general search, and remedies proceedings followed. The European Commission has fined the company billions of euros across separate cases involving Android, shopping results and advertising technology. Alphabet also pays large sums to Apple $AAPL and other device makers to remain the default search engine, a cost structure that would change if courts restrict those deals. Search scale, YouTube's reach and improving cloud economics keep its earnings among the largest in the Fortune 500.

Illustration: Quartz

Microsoft $MSFT converts software into profit through recurring subscriptions rather than one-time sales, a shift that made its earnings steadier and larger than they were in the boxed-software era. Microsoft 365, Azure, and Windows licensing renew on contract cycles, so revenue arrives on a schedule instead of in product-launch bursts.

Azure anchors the model. Businesses rent computing capacity from Microsoft instead of running their own servers, and that spending tends to climb as more workloads move over. Switching to a rival cloud is expensive and disruptive once applications, data, and identity systems sit on one platform, so Azure contracts rarely churn the way consumer subscriptions do. Microsoft competes with Amazon $AMZN Web Services and Google $GOOGL Cloud for that work, and it has committed heavily to new data center construction to serve demand for artificial intelligence computing.

The partnership with OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT, gave Microsoft an early commercial position in selling AI features to customers it already served. OpenAI models run on Azure, and Microsoft sells Copilot add-ons layered onto software that businesses license anyway, charging a premium per seat on top of an existing agreement rather than having to win a new account.

Enterprise software economics handle the rest. Writing the code is the expensive part; serving one more subscriber costs comparatively little beyond support and infrastructure. Spread across a paid user base in the hundreds of millions, that fixed development cost falls per customer as the base grows.

Microsoft also sells into corporate IT budgets through bundles, pairing productivity tools, security, device management, and identity services in agreements that are easier to renew than to unwind. The packaging lifts revenue per customer without raising the cost of serving them at the same rate.

Capital spending is the counterweight. Building data centers and buying the chips AI computing requires consumes cash at a scale unusual for a software company, and the payoff depends on whether AI revenue grows fast enough to cover the buildout.

Illustration: Quartz

JPMorgan $JPM Chase is the largest American bank by assets and routinely the most profitable financial company in the Fortune 500. Its edge is breadth. Consumer banking, credit cards, investment banking, trading, and asset management all sit under one roof, so a weak stretch in one division is often covered by another.

Net interest income supplies the base. The bank funds itself with deposits from tens of millions of households and businesses, pays relatively little for that money, and lends or invests it at higher yields. The gap between the two is the net interest margin. Across a loan and securities book measured in trillions of dollars, small movements in that spread translate into billions of dollars in earnings.

Fees are the second engine, and they behave differently. The corporate and investment bank collects advisory fees on mergers, underwriting fees when clients issue stock and bonds, and trading revenue from handling securities for institutional investors. The asset and wealth management arm charges a percentage of the client money it oversees. None of that income tracks the rate cycle the way lending does, which cushions results when loan spreads narrow.

Scale works on the cost side as well. Technology budgets, compliance staff, cybersecurity, and back-office processing are largely fixed costs. Spreading them across a customer base that runs from branch depositors to multinational corporations lowers the expense attached to each dollar of revenue. A regional bank carries much of the same regulatory burden with a fraction of the revenue to absorb it.

Jamie Dimon, chief executive since the mid-2000s, has long described the strategy as maintaining a fortress balance sheet — holding more capital than regulators require. That caution has repeatedly let JPMorgan buy during panics. It absorbed Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual during the 2008 financial crisis. In May 2023, it acquired First Republic Bank after regulators seized it, picking up affluent clients and deposits while rivals pulled back.

The cost is supervision. As a globally systemic institution, JPMorgan faces capital surcharges and annual stress tests that limit how freely it can deploy its profits.

Illustration: Quartz

Bank of America $BAC's profits rest on one of the cheapest funding bases in American finance: tens of millions of retail checking and savings accounts that pay little or no interest. Money parked in those accounts at near-zero cost can be lent or invested at prevailing market rates, and that gap drives the bank's earnings.

The advantage widens when rates climb. The Federal Reserve raised its benchmark rate repeatedly across 2022 and 2023. What Bank of America earned on loans and securities repriced faster than what it paid depositors. On a balance sheet measured in trillions of dollars, a small move in that spread translates into billions in interest income. Lenders funded by brokered deposits or wholesale borrowing capture less of that benefit, because their cost of funds rises almost in step with the market.

Consumer banking is only half the structure. Merrill, the wealth management arm Bank of America agreed to buy in September 2008 as Lehman Brothers collapsed, charges fees tied to the value of client assets rather than to interest rates. Those fees arrive in quiet markets and busy ones alike, which steadies results in quarters when loan demand softens or trading desks go idle.

Digital banking has reshaped the cost side. Deposits, transfers, and bill payments now move through the mobile app and ATMs rather than teller windows, so the bank can take on more customers without expanding branches and staff at the same pace. Erica, the virtual assistant it launched in 2018, handles routine service requests that once required a phone call to a banker.

Scale covers the rest. Cybersecurity systems, anti-money-laundering compliance, and core banking technology cost close to the same whether a lender serves a few million customers or tens of millions. Bank of America spreads those fixed expenses across a far larger base than any regional rival can.

The model has a clear weak point. Cheap deposits stay cheap only while customers leave the money where it is. A sustained shift into higher-yielding money market funds or Treasury bills would force the bank to pay up for funding and compress the spread the whole arrangement depends on.

Illustration: Quartz

Chevron $CVX's earnings rest on a smaller set of very large assets than most of its peers, which makes its profitability unusually concentrated. The company is strong when those projects run on schedule and crude prices hold, weaker when either slips. Its Permian Basin acreage, the Tengiz field in Kazakhstan, and a stake in Guyana's Stabroek block carry much of the production growth.

The Permian position is the most consequential piece. Chevron holds a large legacy footprint in West Texas and New Mexico, much of it inherited through 19th-century land grants that carry little or no royalty burden. Barrels produced on that acreage cost less to deliver than barrels pumped from leases signed at market rates, and that gap cushions margins when prices fall.

Tengiz, run through the Tengizchevroil joint venture in western Kazakhstan, ranks among the deepest and most productive oil fields in the world. Chevron spent years and tens of billions of dollars expanding it to lift output. The project is a reminder that a major's profit in any given year reflects capital decisions made a decade earlier.

Guyana arrived through the acquisition of Hess Corporation $HES. Chevron announced the deal in October 2023 and closed it in July 2025, after an arbitration panel rejected ExxonMobil $XOM's claim to a right of first refusal over Hess's Stabroek stake. The offshore discoveries on that block are among the largest made anywhere in the past two decades, and securing a share of them was the central logic of the purchase.

Chevron also holds natural gas positions in the eastern Mediterranean, including the Leviathan and Tamar fields off Israel, acquired when it bought Noble Energy in 2020. Those assets supply Israel, Egypt, and Jordan, giving Chevron gas revenue tied to regional contracts rather than to spot crude prices.

Capital allocation follows the same conservative pattern. Chevron has raised its dividend every year for decades and treats that record as a commitment rather than a discretionary payout, which keeps the bulk of its spending in oil and gas rather than in the low-carbon ventures European rivals have funded more heavily. It moved its headquarters from San Ramon, California, to Houston in 2024, consolidating leadership near the center of the U.S. energy industry and away from the state where it began as Pacific Coast Oil in 1879.