Published : 17 October 2026
•
Updated : 17 October 2026, 02:45
A
Abir Ayon
T
Tarek Hosen
When Wahiduzzaman Shamim was accused of making derogatory remarks about Islam, Facebook became more than a platform for circulating the allegation. It became a place to identify the accused, mobilise people, incite violence, and, after his death, justify the killing.
An analysis by The Daily Star of 33 Facebook posts published between October 13 and 15 traces how an allegation of religious insult in Satkhira’s Debhata escalated into calls for punishment, followed by celebrations, justifications, threats, and glorification of the perpetrators.
Shamim, however, is not the only victim of such violence. In October 2025, another young man was beaten by a mob over allegations of desecrating the Quran in the same upazila.
HOW SHAMIM WAS KILLED
According to Shamim’s family, an audio recording of a conversation between him and his wife went viral on Facebook on October 12. Someone had recorded the conversation during an argument between the couple. Allegations that the audio contained remarks insulting religion sparked tension in the area.
HM Shaheen, officer-in-charge of Debhata Police Station, said people first beat Shamim at Kuliya Bazar, near his home, around 5:30pm on October 13. The attackers then took him to a local doctor’s chamber, where they beat him again.
Police rescued Shamim around 6:00pm and took him to the upazila health complex.
The Daily Star found that, around 8:30pm, a procession led by Fazlul Haque Ameni, a local religious speaker, reached Debhata demanding Shamim’s execution. Ameni addressed the crowd before leading more than 200 people to the health complex around 9:00pm.
The attackers dragged Shamim out and beat him again. Doctors, nurses and police tried to stop them but failed.
Around 10:40pm, police finally rescued Shamim and took him to Satkhira Medical College Hospital. However, he died before reaching the hospital, said Manoj Kumar Mondal, the attending medicine specialist.
Shamim’s family said he had a history of mental health problems. He had completed a Kamil degree from a madrasa before earning bachelor’s and master’s degrees from Jagannath University. He leaves behind two children, aged eight years and seven months.
The Facebook posts examined by The Daily Star do not independently establish the allegation against him.
AMENI’S ROLE IN KILLING
The online campaign began hours before Shamim’s death. At 3:31pm on October 13, Ameni went live on Facebook, accusing Shamim of insulting religion and demanding punishment. He named Shamim and identified his location as Putimari Bazar in Debhata.
The 19-minute, 19-second broadcast was followed by another live session at 5:31pm. The two broadcasts received 286 and 1,600 reactions, respectively, while the second was shared 3,600 times.
Over two days, Ameni published 12 posts that incited the crowd, justified the killing and threatened similar fates for future offenders.
At 9:15pm, Ameni labelled Shamim an apostate and declared there would be “no forgiveness”, again specifying his location. Later that night, he published another post dehumanising Shamim and comparing his life to that of a “koi fish” -- a reference to his survival of previous beatings.
By midnight, Ameni’s posts had shifted from the allegation to Shamim’s death.
Ameni expressed gratitude while announcing the death. At the time of reporting, the post had received 879 reactions, 441 comments and 228 shares. Other posts echoed the sentiment, celebrating the death and urging people not to attend Shamim’s funeral.
In his last five posts, Ameni sought to justify the killing, sharing, among other things, the audio recording of Shamim made during the family dispute.
When contacted by The Daily Star, Ameni said neighbours had sent him an audio clip two days before the attack in which Shamim allegedly made the derogatory remarks. He acknowledged being present during the second attack.
CELEBRATING THE KILLING
The response extended beyond Ameni’s posts. Several Facebook users justified the killing, while some framed it as a warning to others.
Another Facebook user urged people to share the news so that the Prophet’s (pbuh) “enemies” would know they could face the same fate. At the time of reporting, the post had received 611 reactions, 115 comments and 25 shares.
Nearly three-quarters of the 476 people who commented on Ameni’s post after Shamim’s death celebrated the killing.
Other posts sought to discredit questions about Shamim’s mental health. On October 15, one post questioned why people described him as mentally ill, asking why someone with a mental illness would allegedly make such remarks.
Another mocked those questioning his mental condition, arguing that his ability to discuss religious texts disproved their claims. Other accounts glorified the crowd, portraying its actions as a legitimate response to provocation.
‘NO NEGLIGENCE’, SAYS POLICE
Police have denied any negligence in the 10 hours between Ameni’s first Facebook Live and Shamim’s death.
“There was no negligence on the part of police. We rescued him after the first assault and remained alert,” said HM Shaheen, officer-in-charge of Debhata Police Station.
Police said they had arrested two people in a case filed by Shamim’s elder brother, Abdul Jalil Sana. The arrestees are Mostafa Hossain Khan and Asadul Islam Molla.
The prime accused, Ameni, remains at large. Police said they are trying to arrest him.
[Our Satkhira correspondent contributed to this report.]
