Published:
Photo by user672303 via Magnific
Succession should be measured by whether the next generation is ready to carry what comes with it.
As Asia enters one of the largest intergenerational wealth transfers in history, survival of succession plans with the person inheriting them is vital.
McKinsey estimates that ultra-high-net-worth (UHNW) and high-net-worth (HNW) families across Asia Pacific will transfer US$5.8t ($7.4t) in wealth by 2030; yet, a recent poll by Sun Life Private Wealth found that 67% of HNW Singaporeans fear their wealth will not outlast their children's generation, with 75% worried that their heirs are ill-equipped to manage their inheritance.
This contradiction is striking. Whilst wealthy families may be over-engineering the transfer of assets, those set to receive are under-prepared.
When it comes to succession, moving wealth is only one part of the process: the mechanisms are already in place. What is harder to transfer is judgement. Succession should therefore be measured not by simply transferring assets and authority, but by whether the next generation is ready to carry what comes with it.
The burden no structure can account for
Succession transfers more than assets and authority. It also passes on expectations, and sometimes guilt, about a legacy they did not build.
This is the psychological aspect to succession, one that often goes unspoken. For an heir, difficult questions can arise. Have I earned this position, or have I simply inherited it? Am I expected to preserve what came before, or am I free to chart a different course?
Those questions directly influence how an heir behaves once given responsibility. Research from Family Business Review suggests that the less a successor identifies with the family, the more guilt shapes their decisions once they are in control.
In practice, I have seen this tension manifest in different ways. Some successors become excessively cautious, fearful of undoing the founder’s legacy. Others may move in the opposite direction, making bold changes to prove their independence.
Neither response is necessarily a failure of capability; it often reflects a successor who has been given responsibility without enough opportunity to develop confidence in how to exercise it.
Low levels of trust between generations can intensify these pressures. PwC's Global NextGen Survey 2024 found that only 24% of next-generation family members across Asia Pacific believe there is an acceptable level of trust with the incumbent generation.
Increasingly, the next generation wants a voice in shaping legacy plans, not just a briefing on what has already been decided. When heirs are excluded from the process and conversations, even a technically sound plan can feel like a burden, not something they are ready to steward.
Participation needs to begin before succession
Financial and legal structures remain essential, but they are not sufficient on their own. Succession also calls for what those structures cannot create: emotional readiness, a settled sense of identity, and judgement that develops through practice.
Singapore's Wealth Management Institute describes this as a "Legacy Flywheel": small, deliberate actions repeated over years to build a family's capacity for stewardship, often starting with philanthropy as a low-stakes way to practise decisions involving capital, values, and competing priorities.
Giving heirs a meaningful role earlier does more than make them feel heard and included; it allows families to see how the next generation handles disagreement, uncertainty, and accountability, well before succession begins. These are difficult qualities to assess through qualifications or titles alone, which is why experience matters. Even next-generation members already holding formal governance roles can leave families questioning their genuine interest and readiness for greater responsibility.
The goal should not be to script every choice the next generation makes, but to give them the context and confidence to make those choices well.
How families can build judgement gradually
In my experience, families who do this well tend to do a few things consistently.
First, they start conversations early and keep returning to them. Succession is too often treated as a single milestone rather than an ongoing one. Revisiting these questions across years, instead of packing them into one difficult sitting, gives heirs time to question and absorb, not simply comply.
Second, they start by giving heirs contained, meaningful responsibility. A philanthropic allocation, a smaller investment mandate, or a defined project — assignments where the consequences of good or poor judgement are real but limited in scale. This is where confidence is genuinely built, and heirs get the chance to make decisions, defend their rationale, and learn from outcomes, whilst the stakes remain manageable.
Third, families explain not only how their wealth is structured, but the purpose behind that wealth. An heir who understands what the wealth was built to achieve is better equipped to make decisions on what should be preserved and what can change.
Finally, advisers can play a broader role. They need not only be involved when a structure needs to be created or assets transferred. They can also facilitate dialogue between generations, mediate differing expectations, and offer an objective sounding board outside the family dynamic itself.
Transfer judgement, not control
The families whose wealth endures are rarely those that transfer control fastest. They are the ones that take time to prepare the next generation to receive it. Trusts, tax structures, and governance frameworks give succession its architecture. But no legal instrument can substitute for judgement, confidence, or a shared understanding of the family's values.
Control is relatively easy to hand over. Judgement, however, is the harder and more valuable inheritance, and one too many families still leave to chance.
Join Singapore Business Review community
Join Singapore Business Review community
A NOTE FROM SINGAPORE BUSINESS REVIEW
Reaching the people who run Asia's businesses is harder than it used to be.
Inboxes are crowded. Attention is short. The executives you most want to reach — the founders, CFOs, and operators who actually move budgets — are the hardest to find through the usual channels. If you're building a company, a category, or a reputation, you already know this.
We've spent twenty years building the room they read. Singapore Business Review is where senior decision makers in Singapore and across Southeast Asia come for business coverage they can't get elsewhere — in print, online, and in person at the summits and roundtables we host across seven markets.
If you have something these readers should know about — a point of view worth publishing, a product worth their attention, an event worth their time — we'd like to hear what you're trying to do.