Bloomberg/Getty Images
- After Mark Zuckerberg drank a Guinness, tech bros can't stop talking about drinking beer.
- One X user created the "Cheeky Pint Benchmark," while another ranked execs on a "beer matrix."
- Cigarettes are in focus, too, after Palantir's CTO said some AI researchers are taking up smoking.
After Mark Zuckerberg’s cautious-looking sip of stout on Stripe cofounder John Collison’s "Cheeky Pint" podcast became a social-media talking point, a new debate has emerged: which tech leaders can actually hold their drink?
Soon after Zuckerberg's much-memed appearance, ETN, a tech podcast, built what it called the "Cheeky Pint Benchmark," publishing a leaderboard of guests' Guinness consumption, measured to the nearest sixth of a pint.
Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, currently tops the chart after drinking three full pints during his appearance on Collison’s show.
Introducing The Cheeky Pint Benchmark.
— etn. (@etnshow) October 13, 2026
We made our intern watch every episode of Cheeky Pint to bring you this breakdown of pints drank by guests to the nearest sixth.
Congratulations to @elonmusk who is currently in the lead with three full pints of Guinness. pic.twitter.com/YTTP4P6BSA
The chart prompted characteristically competitive responses from the tech world.
Antonio García Martínez, a director at Base, said the benchmark was "weak sauce in general."
1. Richest man in the world drank the most
— Antonio García Martínez (agm.eth) (@antoniogm) October 13, 2026
2. This is pretty weak sauce in general, though not bad for people on a public podcast with a reputation on the line
3. Kind of curious if the Collisons match their guests https://t.co/JhqTjDztEe
Andreessen Horowitz partner Martin Casado joked that he'd drink so much if he went on the podcast that the index would need a new scale.
If they invite me, you'll need to make this log scale. https://t.co/8YaB0yWPun
— martin_casado (@martin_casado) October 14, 2026
The benchmark follows a viral clip of Zuckerberg appearing to grimace after taking a sip of Guinness during a recent two-hour-plus episode with Meta’s chief AI officer, Alexandr Wang.
One X user came to Zuckerberg’s defense, arguing that Guinness was "performative at best" and noting that the Meta CEO had nevertheless finished two beers during the interview.
Zuckerberg himself replied simply: "that’s just my face."
that's just my face
— Mark Zuckerberg (@finkd) October 13, 2026
Wang also appeared to embrace the joke, responding to a fan-made "Tech Founder Beer Matrix" that placed founders on a spectrum from "beer sippers" to "beer tankers," and from "good hang" to "bad hang."
The chart positioned Wang firmly on the beer-tanker side — despite not finishing a full pint on the podcast — alongside figures including Elon Musk, Larry Ellison, and former Apple CEO Tim Cook.
you can’t possibly actually think i’m the same quality hang as tim apple https://t.co/GBwnpUe6Rt
— Alexandr Wang (@alexandr_wang) October 14, 2026
Intercom cofounder Des Traynor took issue with being placed on the "beer sippers" side of the matrix, saying he was the first "multi-pint drinker" to appear on "Cheeky Pint," and that his episode included a detailed discussion of beer.
This is the most insulted I've ever been on Twitter in ~20 years, and that's saying something.
— Des Traynor (@destraynor) October 13, 2026
Not to pull receipts, but I was the first multi-pint drinker on Cheeky Pint, and we spoke in detail about various beers on the episode itself. https://t.co/x5MlxkeqlC
The leaderboard’s methodology is already under scrutiny. Will O'Brien, founder of autonomous aquatic vehicle firm Ulysses, argued that the figures should be adjusted for episode length, using pints per hour rather than raw totals.
He also said other alcoholic drinks should count if the point is to identify who is "actually DRINKING."
Totally inaccurate chart and not a proper way of measuring this metric.
— will o’brien (@Willob) October 14, 2026
The pints should be normalized by time. It should be pints per hour.
Elon was on for like 5 hours. Not fair vs other guests.
Also some guests drank non-Guinness alcohol. They should be accounted for.… https://t.co/qn4gHoOSUW
Kalshi cofounder Tarek Mansour also disputed the "Cheeky Pint Benchmark," saying he had to leave his appearance before it ended. Still, he found a silver lining: he drank more than Andreessen Horowitz cofounder Marc Andreessen.
This is unfair. I had to walk out mid pod.
— Tarek Mansour (@mansourtarek_) October 13, 2026
At least I beat @pmarca though https://t.co/H28i8xY4ge
Musk, meanwhile, basked in the glow of topping the chart, replying with beer mugs and a laughing emoji — while adding that he "hardly ever" drinks alcohol.
🍻 🤣
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 13, 2026
Funny thing is that I hardly ever drink alcohol! https://t.co/sQsfbGhocD
The jokes come as Silicon Valley is seeing a sharper divide between those embracing vice and those seeking to optimize every aspect of their health.
As Business Insider’s Henry Chandonnet reported last month, a small group of founders, engineers, and investors has embraced cigarettes in a sector previously known for its healthy obsessions.
Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev also posted this week that he was "hearing more and more AI researchers are taking up smoking," adding: "superintelligence is near."
Hearing more and more AI researchers are taking up smoking … superintelligence is near
— Vlad Tenev (@vladtenev) October 12, 2026
That idea resurfaced after Palantir CTO Shyam Sankar described AI researchers taking up smoking to signal their confidence that artificial intelligence will cure cancer.
After Sankar's comments, longevity entrepreneur Bryan Johnson — who is famed for his fanatical pursuit of good health — joked that he was ready to pivot to smoking, drinking, fast food, and all-nighters.
ok, I'm in. pivoting to:
— Bryan Johnson (@bryan_johnson) October 13, 2026
> smoking, drinking, fast food
> hard drugs, all-nighters, ragers
> STIs, sun burns, deafening concerts https://t.co/2pl8bYsuE4 pic.twitter.com/Fra0WqfCi3
For now, though, the emerging tech-industry trend appears to be less about optimizing for longevity than proving one is relaxed enough not to care.