Kara Swisher? Walter Isaacson? The Hollywood Guessing Game Over David Ellison's CNN and CBS News Editorial Board

Skydance chairman David Ellison is looking for five widely respected journalists to serve on a new independent editorial oversight board at CNN and CBS News—a watchdog panel he agreed to create only under the pressure of an antitrust lawsuit that threatened to blow up his deal to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery. Moreover, the board has been tasked with keeping the media mogul from meddling in his own newsrooms.

The trick will be finding five journalists who command respect across the political spectrum—and are willing to stake their reputations on an oversight panel appointed by the very executives they're supposed to keep in check. The board’s five members must be current or former journalists with at least 10 years of experience and no more than two appointees can share a political affiliation. The partisan provision was included to create the appearance of political balance but several veteran journalists say it will ultimately act as a deterrent because it’s not easy to find journalists who openly declare allegiances to political parties.

“A lot of journalists are going to be extremely uncomfortable, probably to the point of declining to participate, to be identified with a political party in terms of their appointment,” Dick Tofel, the former president of ProPublica, tells Vanity Fair.

Little has been made public yet about what this board will look like, or how its members will be selected. For this story, Vanity Fair spoke with journalism veterans and industry insiders, including former leaders of major national news organizations, about who they think might be asked to serve on the board—and whether it will have any real power. One former editor-in-chief of legacy national newspapers says he heard that Charles Forelle, a former Wall Street Journal reporter now working under Bari Weiss at CBS News, is the person burdened with the unenviable assignment of finding board members. They say they heard Forelle has been speaking with candidates. Skydance has until April 4, 2027, to make its board appointments. A spokesperson for CBS News denied Forelle’s involvement, and Forelle did not respond to a request for comment. If one of Weiss’s deputies was seen influencing the board’s recruitment, it could immediately taint its public perception.

A former cable news president familiar with the companies tells VF that likely recruits are old-school media executives eager to get back in the game. They said the board seat offers more in terms of status than authority, and journalists who already have significant influence and editorial power are unlikely to be enticed.

Some of the names being floated include former NBC News chairman Andrew Lack; veteran news producer Jim Bell, who is currently the senior vice president of media for the LA28 Olympic and Paralympic Games; tech journalist Kara Swisher; and former CNN chairman Walter Isaacson—though there is no indication any of those people have been approached yet. Swisher, one person suggested, is probably too outspoken to accept a position with so little power although they say her presence would give the board some credibility considering her public criticism of the Ellisons and CBS News. Isaacson, Swisher, Bell, and Lack did not respond to VF’s request for comment.

The board was a condition of the settlement with state attorneys general that cleared the way for Skydance’s acquisition of CNN’s previous parent company. The idea was to put some distance between Ellison’s (or Weiss') personal politics and the journalism produced by CNN.

“It matters not who gets on this board because it’s completely performative,” says the former cable news president who spoke with Vanity Fair on background.

“I wouldn’t advise anyone I respect to be part of it,” says Dan Gillmor, cofounder of the News Co/Lab at Arizona State University’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication.

Tofel, who says he has not been approached about serving, calls the partisan requirement a fundamental flaw in the board’s design. He pointed to his own experience as a resident of New York, where voters generally have to register with a political party to participate in primary elections. Although he is enrolled in a party, he doesn’t consider his political affiliation central to his professional identity. However, party registration could be used by Skydance during the recruitment process as a measure of a journalist’s partisan slant. Journalists who live in open-primary states likely wouldn’t face that problem.

“I would not want to be appointed as a partisan to a board like this because I think that completely misunderstands the role of independent journalism,” he says.

Seth Stern, director of advocacy at the Freedom of the Press Foundation, is equally skeptical. He predicted that the political requirements, combined with concerns about Ellison’s stewardship of CBS News, would discourage many qualified candidates.

A lack of qualified candidates doesn’t serve either of the parties involved in the settlement well. For Ellison and Skydance, there could actually be some financial benefits derived from appointing a widely respected board. “They want to signal to their advertisers, to their commercial partners, that they’re not meddling, and that they’re respecting the integrity of the news organization,” says Marcus W. Brauchli, a former managing editor of The Wall Street Journal and executive editor of The Washington Post.